The Iran war has reverberated through energy and financial markets, rekindling inflation concerns and risks to economic growth. Unlike last year, when the source of these worries was President Donald Trump’s tariffs, the concerns now are based on fears that sharply higher oil prices could become entrenched.
Any extended period of high energy costs threatens tipping the economy into a recession while also keeping upward pressure on inflation, a rare economic predicament known as stagflation.
What is stagflation?
Stagflation occurs when a slowdown in growth takes place alongside rising joblessness and accelerating inflation. Iain Macleod, a British politician, coined the term in 1965, combining the words “stagnation” and “inflation.” Plenty of economists once doubted stagflation was possible. That’s because slower demand typically limits how much businesses can charge for goods and services, capping prices. But it can occur if the economy faces new upward pressures on prices — tariffs or oil-supply shocks, for example — that aren’t driven by rising demand.
What causes stagflation?
Economists point to a combination of external shocks and policy missteps as the recipe for stagflation. Much of their analysis is based on the most famous episode of stagflation, in the US during the 1970s. In 1971, President Richard Nixon reacted to decades of building balance-of-payments pressures, when more capital was flowing out of the US than coming in, by taking the US off the gold standard — that is, letting the dollar’s value float. The currency’s subsequent fall relative to other currencies added to inflationary pressures at home.
Then in 1973, during the oil embargo on the US and other nations, oil prices surged. As a result, US businesses not only passed along those costs but cut back on production — a step that added to inflation while also increasing unemployment. Some also point to mistakes by the Federal Reserve, which waited to raise interest rates. By 1975, the so-called Misery Index — the sum of inflation and the unemployment rate — reached 19.9%. It peaked in 1980 at 22%.
How are stagflation risks evolving now?
For economists, stagflation risks would increase significantly only if disruptions of supplies including oil and petroleum products persisted.
But the risk of stagflation can’t be totally discounted. Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remains essentially near a stand-still. The US labor market, meanwhile, is fragile, and consumers remain frustrated by a still-high cost of living. Rising fuel prices, if sustained, have the potential to curtail the household spending that has been a key driver of economic growth.
How bad could it get?
Economists say that some ingredients of stagflation, including the inflationary impact of tariffs, are slowly building. Sal Guatieri, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets, contends that the Iran war will lift inflation while rattling investor and business confidence. Still, economists don’t see job losses or inflation rising to anywhere near levels that prevailed in the mid-1970s, when the unemployment rate hit 9% and inflation soared above 10%.
What might stagflation feel like for US consumers?
If stagflation were to take hold, consumers would face higher prices for all kinds of goods and services as companies pass on the increase in the costs of energy, household services and transportation. At the same time, more Americans would lose their jobs and have a harder time finding new ones.
What does it mean for interest rates?
The Federal Reserve committee that sets interest rates will have to decide whether it wants to cut borrowing costs to shore up the job market, or keep rates steady to make sure inflation expectations stay in check. In early March, Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee said supply shocks such as higher oil prices have the potential to “lead you in a stagflationary direction.” But Fed Governor Christopher Waller said he doesn’t expect the Iran conflict to have a sustained impact on inflation.
