The strongest earnings season in years is coming to a close, and the Wall Street analysts who focus on individual companies have rarely been this bullish.
They raised their stock price targets at the fastest pace since the Iran war began as results poured in and continually beat expectations. Cumulatively, they now indicate that the S&P 500 Index will rise 18% from here.
Meanwhile, an aggregate of analysts’ profit estimates implies that, at current multiples, the S&P 500 will jump 19% from Friday’s close to end the year above 8,800, amounting to a full-year gain of 29%, which would make it the best year for the index since the 1990s, data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence show. And there’s only one firm in the S&P 500 with a consensus sell rating.
But for the Street’s macro market strategists, who take a broader view of where indexes should be relative to the global economy and external risks, it’s a different story. To them, the war in Iran, a troubling inflation outlook and weak consumer sentiment are crucial metrics that weigh heavily on their predictions. Taken together, they see the S&P 500 ending 2026 at 7,625, up just 3.3% from where it is now after Friday’s selloff.
Historically, a massive difference between the two Wall Street camps foreshadows problems for investors. The trouble this time could be that after a dazzling earnings season where S&P 500 companies posted almost 30% profit growth, blowing past expectations of 12%, single-stock analysts who apply a “bottoms-up” fundamentals-based technique are overlooking key risks that could affect their conclusions.
“The bottoms-up analysts are hearing from the CEOs comments like, ‘If we had more compute, there’d be unlimited demand’ or ‘we could make more money, but there’s bottlenecks.’ said Christopher Cain, with Bloomberg Intelligence’s global equity strategy team. “That’s getting the bottoms-up people very bullish.”
Rarely have single-stock analysts been this enthusiastic about the S&P 500 relative to their macro-focused counterparts. Even the highest macro strategist forecast for the S&P 500 doesn’t come close to that level of bullishness expressed by the analysts, with Ed Yardeni seeing the S&P at 8,250 by year-end, followed by Oppenheimer’s John Stoltzfus, 22V Research’s Dennis DeBusschere and Citigroup’s Scott Chronert at 8,100.
Part of the issue is analysts are historically overly optimistic about the companies they cover. Since 1985, single-stock analysts have predicted annual earnings growth of 13% for their stocks, when in reality S&P 500 firms delivered 7% annual profit growth, according to Owen Lamont, senior vice president and portfolio manager at Acadian Asset Management. Today, those analysts are forecasting 20% growth, he added.
“Times when analysts predict high growth are typically bad times to invest in the stock market,” Lamont wrote in a note to clients on Wednesday. “The ideal time is when we observe pessimism, not optimism.”
Admittedly, this is a difficult environment for single-stock analysts to be anything but bullish. The race to build computing infrastructure for artificial intelligence has tech giants flooding the market with trillions of dollars in cash over the next several years, leading to booms in everything from chipmakers, memory providers and old-school technology hardware manufacturers, to the industrial companies that will build the new data centers and the utilities that will power them.
“When we see profit margins and earnings accelerations of this magnitude, it’s hard to have an objective view,” said Marta Norton, chief investment strategist at Empower Personal Wealth.
That’s why some Wall Street researchers expect gap to narrow somewhat as some macro strategists rework their full-year estimates to account for much stronger earnings and based on the S&P 500 already beating their earlier expectations.
“A big reason why we raised our target was because earnings growth has been much stronger than expected,” said Ed Clissold, chief US strategist at Ned Davis Research Inc., who lifted his year-end target for the S&P 500 to 7,950 from 7,100 on Tuesday. That implies a 7.7% advance for the rest of the year.
There’s also a timing effect at play: Company analysts generally like to publish reports within hours of earnings calls, sometimes raising or lowering price targets right then. Strategists, however, publish less often and are more resistant to changing full-year targets, typically updating their views around midyear. This year, they will likely have to take into account the unexpected earnings strength, said Keith Lerner, chief market strategist and chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services.
“You will start to see changes in estimates because the bottom line is estimates were one thing coming into the year and now earnings are much higher,” he said. “It’s going to be tough for people to bet that earnings are coming down, because they’ve been so strong.”
That being said, analyst price target cuts outnumbered raises this week for the first time since mid-April, just the fifth week in 2026 where cuts outnumbered raises over the last year.
For macro-level strategists, the overall picture doesn’t warrant the level of optimism expressed by the so-called bottoms up analysts, according to Rob Haworth, senior investment strategy director at US Bank Wealth Management, which is revisiting its year-end S&P 500 forecast given the blockbuster earnings season. His issue is their figures assume companies will keep putting up near perfect earnings growth and the stocks will receive market multiples that are several points higher than where the S&P 500 currently trades.
“We have more downside scenarios than what the bottoms-up analysts are seeing,” he said.
