tag

The Iran war has led the shipping sector to wade through risk-priced, not demand-priced, waters; giving windfall gains to tankers and opening arbitrage opportunities across regions; even as the global economy stares at stagflation.Disruption in the shipping sector, facing war risk premium, hits critical upstream inputs, leading to unsustainable cost-push factors, especially in the food, manufacturing and construction sectors, thus raising the risk of higher inflation and lower growth.Demand destruction, margin compression and rising subsidy burdens have become the offshoot of disruption in the shipping sector, now grappling with industry consolidation pressures.Geopolitical shock is affecting availability of both ships and tradable routes, as the Strait of Hormuz, which normally carries about 20% of global oil/LNG, leads to supply-side squeeze in available tonnage and operational inefficiencies.The war has temporarily broken the global energy shipping system at its most critical chokepoint, which is reportedly operating at 1-5% of normal capacity. Some five to eight tankers pass through now compared to as many as 100-120 ships pre-war.Only “approved” or “non-hostile” vessels are being allowed through the Strait of Hormuz, which has shifted from a free global trade route to a restricted, permission-based corridor.Since March 13, Lloyd's have traced 33 transits via the Larak detour route. There have been no transits tracked via the "normal" route since March 15. Bulk carrier activity has been dominating, with an increase in westbound traffic after a weeks-long lull in activity.Freight rates today are less a reflection of trade, more a price of navigating war. Logistics shock turned into a supply shock with the tanker segment witnessing unprecedented day rate spikes to $400,00 to $420,000 for VLCCs (very large crude carriers); and $250,000 for Suezmax, mainly driven by risk compensation and reduced fleet participation.The resultant shocks led to supercharging of shadow fleet, which acted as central and shock absorber for the disrupted supply chains but with higher systemic risks.Shadow fleet, a network of oil tankers operating outside standard regulatory, insurance, and tracking systems to transport sanctioned crude, has accounted for 83% tanker/gas carrier transits captured between March 19 and 25. This figure was 76% between March 12 and 18, according to Lloyd's database.Global insurers have begun signing new war risk contracts for ships entering the Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz at 3%-5% of a vessel’s hull replacement value, renewable every seven days, compared to 0.15%-0.25% pre-war.The supply shocks due to spiking oil and gas prices further turns into an economy-wide inflation, leading to many economies, especially in Southeast Asia resort to emergency.Nigel Green, founder of deVere Group, an independent financial advisory firm which serves over 80,000 clients across 100 countries, had said households, businesses and investors should brace up for global stagflation.“The figures show the severe impact the Iran war is already having on the euro zone economy,” he said, adding “but, like in the 1970s, stagflation could become a widespread global phenomenon characterised by high inflation, low growth, and high unemployment, heavily driven by oil price shocks.”Besides, the shipping industry has to weather the challenges of crew safety risks, uninsurable exposure and political constraints as it meanders uneven crisis-driven super cycle.Nevertheless, container shipping, which operates on network logistics, has not experienced the same upside as tankers owing to structural insulation (not heavy dependent on Hormuz Strait), operational flexibility (plausible rerouting), prior adaptation (due to Red Sea disruptions) and economic buffering.The global shipping industry’s resilience will depend on diversification of routes and energy sources, investment in risk intelligence and alignment with geopolitical realities. 

Qatar National Bank (QNB) predicted that upcoming US Federal Reserve interest-rate decisions could lead to a mild stagflation scenario, where growth slows while inflation remains above target. In its weekly report, QNB noted that the current US administration has clearly focused on monetary policy and has urged the Federal Reserve to deliver large rate cuts and adopt a more flexible stance. The report explained that monetary policy decisions are normally based on forecasts of key macroeconomic variables and a careful analysis of how interest-rate changes affect economic activity and prices, with the Federal Open Market Committee typically carrying out this process through extensive technical deliberations free from political pressure. The bank observed that new economic trends has unsettled financial markets, causing significant volatility as investors try to determine the appropriate level of interest rates for pricing assets in the new macroeconomic environment. US interest rates and Treasury yields were said to provide important information on macroeconomic expectations, particularly through the real yield curve (the gap between yields on 10-year and 2-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities). A wider gap indicates expectations of weaker short-term growth relative to the long term. This gap has widened in 2025 even though long-term real yields have remained stable, suggesting that longer-term growth expectations have not changed while near-term activity is expected to weaken. Recent US labor-market data were highlighted as evidence of this slowdown, showing slower job creation and a gradual rise in unemployment in recent months. Consensus forecasts for real GDP growth have also been revised downward, with expectations for 2025 and 2026 reduced by about 0.5 percentage points to 1.5% and 1.7% respectively, levels approaching the weakest annual growth since the post-COVID recession. The report stressed that real interest rates remain highly restrictive. With the federal funds rate upper bound at 4.5% and inflation at roughly 2.7%, the real rate is close to 1.8%, well above the estimated neutral rate of roughly 0.5-1.0 percentage points. QNB argued that current rates are overly tight and need adjustment to avoid a sharp growth slowdown. Short-term Treasury yields were described as closely tracking market expectations for the Fed's policy path. The two-year Treasury yield has fallen about 60 basis points this year (from a January peak of 4.40% to roughly 3.80%) signaling expectations of a substantial rate-cutting cycle. Markets now anticipate two 25-basis-point cuts by the end of 2025, followed by additional reductions through 2026, which would bring the policy rate down to around 3% by the end of that year. QNB concluded that these indicators point to a moderate stagflationary environment, with inflation staying above the Fed's 2% target even as growth weakens. Members of the Federal Open Market Committee were reported to have acknowledged a shift in the balance of risks toward slower growth, with markets expecting a policy-easing cycle that lowers the federal funds rate to roughly 3% by the end of 2026.