tag

Oil prices bounced higher on Thursday while Asian stocks fell, as new US strikes on Iran marked the latest test of a shaky ceasefire in the Middle East war.In Hong Kong, the Hang Seng Index closed down 1.3% to 25,006.16 points; Tokyo - Nikkei 225 ended down 0.5% to 64,693.12 points and Shanghai - Composite closed up 0.1% to 4,098.64 points yesterday.The price jumps erased much of Wednesday's declines on the hopes of an imminent deal to end the conflict that has all but halted shipping through the crucial Strait of Hormuz for months.An American official said the military had shot down four Iranian drones and struck a control centre in the southern city of Bandar Abbas.The official, speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity, described the latest actions as "measured, purely defensive, and intended to maintain the ceasefire".Tehran's state media said Iranian forces had fired at four ships in the strait, while Kuwait said its air defences were responding to missile and drone attacks.The developments came despite an Iranian official saying renewed hostilities with the United States were unlikely, and a threat from US President Donald Trump to "finish the job" if a peace deal was not reached.The mixed signals underscored the fragile state of talks aimed at ending the Middle East war, which has profoundly shaken global energy markets.Brent North Sea crude, the main international benchmark, rose more than two percent during Thursday trade to nearly $97 a barrel, while the main US contract, WTI, increased at a similar pace to around $91 a barrel.Stock markets across Asia saw losses on Thursday, with main benchmarks in Hong Kong, Taipei and Sydney closing more than one percent lower.Tokyo and Seoul saw more moderate declines, while Shanghai was the sole major exchange to buck the trend, finishing the day up 0.1%.During morning trading in Europe, London fell nearly 1% while Paris was down 0.4%. Frankfurt was flat.The drops came after a strong day for global stocks on Wednesday, as investors, bullish on artificial intelligence, looked past the conflicting headlines on Iran.In Asia, South Korean chipmaker SK hynix hit a $1tn market capitalisation, placing it alongside regional tech heavyweights Samsung Electronics and TSMC, as well as US chipmaker Micron.The tech surge has coincided with a persistent spike in energy prices, which has threatened several major Asian economies that rely on oil shipments from the Middle East.Economists warn that central banks may have to raise interest rates if inflation worsens as a result of the war, increasing borrowing costs and potentially weighing on economic growth.On Wednesday, "every headline pulled the market in a different direction, leaving traders with the same conclusion they have been wrestling with for weeks", said Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management."The Strait may eventually reopen fully, but until there is something more concrete than draft frameworks and political theatre, every barrel remains hostage to headline volatility, even if sub-$100," he said. 

The UAE's decision to leave the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) was three years in the making and is based on its view that the world is near the "autumn of the hydrocarbon age”, meaning the country needs to maximise oil revenues while it can, a senior adviser to the president said.The UAE ended its nearly 60-year membership of the Opec on May 1.In the immediate term, the decision is unlikely to affect the market because of Iran's effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, but it could have a major impact on Opec's control over supplies when oil flows normalise.Anwar Gargash, adviser to UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed al-Nahyan, said that the country's exit was chiefly because its Opec production quotas kept output well below capacity."We see that we are close to the sort of autumn of the hydrocarbon age," he added. "And as a result, if you have the ability to produce and generate income and use that income in other investments, that's what you should do."The UAE's production capacity is 4.85mn barrels per day (bpd).It plans to raise it to 5mn bpd by 2027. Just before its exit from Opec and the wider Opec+ group, which brings in other oil producers led by Russia, its production target was closer to 3.5mn bpd.ADNOC chief executive Sultan al-Jaber, speaking on Wednesday, said that the UAE would continue to be a responsible, stabilising force in energy markets. 

Oil market supply tight through 2026 despite Hormuz reopening: Moody’s Oil market may remain supply-constrained with persistently higher and volatile energy prices, leading to broader “knock-on” effects, even if safe passage through the Hormuz Strait were to resume in the next six months, according to Moody’s, an international credit rating agency. Cautioning that the knock-on effects are expected through costs, demand and financing conditions for exposed borrowers; Moody’s said “these lasting supply constraints, combined with embedded geopolitical risks, will result in persistently higher energy prices, with Brent crude averaging $90-$110 a barrel (bbl) through much of the year.” Persistently higher energy prices will lead to increases in inflation and production costs, limiting household purchasing power, complicating the path for monetary policy across major economies and tightening financing conditions, it said in a report. Highlighting that it now sees a single, central scenario which assumes a prolonged and significant disruption to the Strait of Hormuz through autumn; Moody’s said under this scenario, it continues to assume no major damage to key production facilities or infrastructure, but expects sustained disruption to shipping, including energy supplies and related products, through autumn of 2026. “Transit flows should gradually improve from current levels as oil importers bilaterally negotiates passage, though a return to pre-conflict traffic volumes is unlikely,” it said. Even where mitigating factors emerge - such as an early negotiated settlement, faster-than-expected improvement in transit flows, or higher non-Opec supply - any improvement in credit conditions will be gradual, with normalisation still taking several months, it said, expecting geopolitical uncertainty to persist through much of the year, alongside ongoing vulnerabilities in energy markets and supply chains. Expecting transit flows to gradually improve, but through bilateral channels rather than a general reopening; it said oil importers — particularly China, India, Japan and Republic of Korea — to negotiate passage bilaterally with Iran, potentially through coordinated transit corridors such as those reportedly emerging near Larak Island and through Omani territorial waters. “This would allow some incremental improvement in energy transit flows from near zero now, but the process will be slow, opaque and subject to interruption. A return to pre-conflict traffic volumes in 2026 is unlikely,” it added. Finding that core energy infrastructure in the Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) region has not suffered lasting damage, it said the supply shock is driven by the disruption to transit, not the destruction of productive capacity. Highlighting that the Strait disruption is no longer a short-lived supply interruption buffered by inventories but is now a structural supply constraint drawing down global stocks, constraining refinery throughput and keeping crude and refined product prices persistently high; Moody’s said the effects extend beyond crude. “Qatar supplies around 20% of worldwide LNG (liquefied natural gas) trade, almost all of which transits the Strait. Prolonged disruption will keep prices high for natural gas, particularly in Europe and Asia, and also for fertilisers, aluminium and other industrial inputs, with knock-on effects on food prices,” it said. 

Japan’s heavy reliance on imported oil means swings in crude prices feed quickly into its currency and trade balance. The government has hinted that it might step into the oil market in an indirect bid to support the weakening yen, as the war in the Middle East drives up energy costs and threatens the global economy.Trading oil futures to prop up the currency would be a novel approach for Japan and mark the latest effort to mix up its intervention approach to keep speculators guessing. National governments rarely step into energy derivatives markets directly, but Japan’s Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama has expressed concern that speculative trading in oil futures is affecting the foreign exchange market. She said the government stands ready to take “all possible measures, on all fronts.” How are oil prices affecting the yen?Almost all of Japan’s oil consumption is met by overseas imports, and more than 90% of these shipments usually come from the Middle East. The disruption to supply from the Arabian Gulf and increase in benchmark crude prices since late February has driven up the cost of fuel, electricity and food. The risk of a hit to Japan’s economy has already triggered the government to begin releasing 80mn barrels of oil from its national reserves.When energy costs rise, the country needs more dollars to pay for imports, putting downward pressure on the yen and adding to inflation. In the shorter term, speculators can bet on the direction of oil prices and the yen, amplifying volatility. If Japan can cool crude prices, this might ease the pressure on the currency by shaking off some of the speculators. The yen has weakened sharply against the dollar since the start of the Iran conflict.Proponents of government intervention argue that the sheer size of the so-called paper oil market — futures and derivatives trading, which far exceeds physical supply — could make such action effective, even if the impact is indirect. How would intervention in the oil market work?The government could enter the market in many ways. The challenge is finding an approach that maximizes the impact while minimizing the potential cost. One option is to short oil — selling futures contracts in an effort to push current benchmark prices lower — and covering those positions in small amounts over time. Position limits could cap the number of trades in a single contract month, avoiding concentration by spreading the intervention across the futures curve.Any trades would likely be executed through financial institutions, as with standard intervention in foreign exchange markets. The Finance Ministry has contacted major banks in Tokyo with oil trading operations to gather views on intervening in crude oil futures, according to people familiar with the matter.It’s unclear how big any oil market intervention would be, though it would likely be far smaller than the government’s currency interventions, given the experimental nature of the trade and the scale of the dollar-yen market. Japan spent ¥5.9tn ($37bn) on currency intervention in a single operation in April 2024, helping move the exchange rate by more than ¥5 — its largest-ever effort to support the yen. Risking a similar amount on an untested approach seems unlikely.It also remains to be seen at what point Japan would potentially step in. Unless oil prices rise significantly beyond current levels, the incentive to intervene may remain limited. The yen didn’t breach ¥160 per dollar — the rough threshold for Japan’s most recent currency market interventions in 2024 — even when crude approached $120 a barrel in March. Have other countries intervened in the oil trading market?Few countries have ventured into oil trading for macroeconomic purposes.Mexico runs a sovereign oil hedge — the so-called hacienda hedge — which uses derivatives to protect government revenue in the event of falling prices, rather than to influence markets. Malaysia’s state-owned Petroliam Nasional Bhd also known as Petronas, also uses financial hedges, including oil options, to cushion its revenue from crude price volatility.Influencing oil prices — and by extension a currency — would be far more complex.The US considered trading in the oil futures market as one way to contain rising energy prices amid the Iran war. But the Trump administration appears to have ruled out this option. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in mid-March “we’re absolutely not doing that.” What are the risks for Japan?Sometimes just talk of intervention can itself be a tool to prop up the yen. Authorities may be hoping to influence speculative traders through verbal warnings, contacting dealers, and by floating new ideas.If the government were to actually intervene in oil markets, it would be doing so at a time of high volatility driven by the conflict in the Middle East. Shorting oil risks steep losses if crude prices rise and may not have a meaningful impact on the yen, which could damage the government’s credibility. Any trading losses would compound the pain the economy feels from rising import costs.Some are skeptical that Japan will step into the market. Junya Tanase, chief Japan currency strategist at JPMorgan Chase & Co, said that the likelihood of an oil futures intervention is “extremely low, at least in the near term.” 

The chaos that has gripped the oil market looks set to deepen in the coming days, with more production being shut off as the war in Iran keeps the Strait of Hormuz closed to tankers, and the US considers widening its range of targets in the country.The United Arab Emirates and Kuwait have already started reducing oil production as storage runs down, joining Iraq. Others may be forced to follow as oil tankers continue avoiding the narrow waterway, rapidly reducing the number of empty ones available for loading.Once all the tankers are loaded, the region’s remaining on-land storage will fill even quicker.The upheaval shows no sign of imminent resolution, meaning a strip of water that normally handles a fifth of the world’s oil is impassable for commercial ships. About a third of the region’s production can theoretically bypass Hormuz, with Saudi Arabia already diverting huge amounts of crude to its Red Sea coast for export.Iran has vowed not to back down in the face of US and Israeli strikes that began on February 28. President Donald Trump responded on Saturday by saying the US would now consider targeting areas and groups of people in Iran that were not previously aimed for. The attacks will continue “until they surrender or, more likely, completely collapse!” he said in a social media post.For oil analysts, executives and traders, that has meant ever-louder warnings that the war is bringing crude to a tipping point, and closer to the psychological $100-a-barrel threshold. Brent already climbed 30% last week — its biggest jump in six years, putting it just dollars from that mark.Other markers tied closely to the region have already soared through that level. Futures tied to Abu Dhabi’s flagship Murban crude closed at $103 a barrel on Friday, while Oman crude futures were at $107. Chinese crude oil futures on the Shanghai International Energy Exchange ended, in US dollar terms, at $109.“Every additional day of disruption adds pressure, and in that scenario there is effectively no ceiling to prices in the short term,” said former trader Stefano Grasso, a senior portfolio manager at Singapore-based fund 8VantEdge Pte.For one, there are growing threats to oil infrastructure — raising the risk of disruptions that could outlast attacks in the area. Saudi Arabia intercepted drones that were heading toward the 1mn-barrel-a-day Shaybah oil field over the weekend. Strikes in Bahrain and Qatar have also continued.There is also the continued blockage of the Strait of Hormuz. Over the past days, only Iran-linked tankers and two bulk carriers, which claimed to be Chinese-owned, have been seen transiting.The US has promised to bolster financial protection and potentially provide military escorts, and announced on Friday that it would roll out maritime reinsurance for the Arabian Gulf region. The facility will cover losses up to about $20bn “on a rolling basis”, according to a statement.For shipowners and charterers operating in the region, however, the cost of insurance is not the major concern holding up traffic. Instead, they worry about the safety of vessels and crew, and say they would need full naval escort — along the lines of Operation Prosperity Guardian, a coalition to safeguard shipping in the Red Sea — or preferably an end to hostilities.Other US moves to dampen oil price increases include allowing India to access Russian oil currently held in floating storage in the region. Washington has also floated tapping its strategic petroleum reserve or even intervening in futures markets — officials have since downplayed these ideas, while Trump has brushed off inflationary worries even as US gasoline prices spike.“This is an excursion,” he said on Saturday. “We figured oil prices would go up, which they will, they’ll also come down, they’ll come down very fast.”Import-dependent Asia, which leans heavily on the Middle East, is feeling the most immediate pain.In Japan — which takes over 90% of its crude from the region — refiners are asking for the option of drawing on national oil reserves. Others, including China, have curbed fuel exports to preserve supply and keep domestic prices controlled. South Korea is considering reinstating an oil price cap for the first time in 30 years, state news agency Yonhap reported on Sunday, citing government officials.In northwest Europe, meanwhile, the price of jet fuel soared to an all-time high of $1,528 a ton — the equivalent of more than $190 a barrel — on Thursday, according to figures from General Index that go back to 2008. The impact on jet fuel is particularly sharp because half of the European Union’s imports typically pass through Hormuz.For analysts at ING Groep NV, the base case is now four weeks of disruption — two of full upheaval and two weeks of 50%, said Warren Patterson, the bank’s head of commodities strategy in Singapore.“This scenario doesn’t necessarily mean that we see a full end to the conflict in this time period,” he said. “But if US and Israeli strikes degrade Iran’s ability to attack vessels and enforce a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, we could see flows starting to normalize.”The bank’s most dramatic scenario is a three-month, full disruption to oil and liquefied natural gas flows. This would likely see oil prices spiking to records through the second quarter, the bank’s analysts wrote in a note. 

The oil market is in the middle of its strongest start to a year since 2022 as supply shocks and sanctions confound expectations of a glut. Now traders are racing to cover themselves against the prospect of the US attacking Iran again. A surge in activity across futures and options markets is already pulling up crude prices — Brent futures touched a seven-month high of more than $72 a barrel on Friday, and some analysts see a risk premium of as much as $10. The rally — Brent is up about 18% since the end of last year — represents a marked shift from just weeks ago, when traders were focused on forecasts for a record surplus, especially around now.**media[419803]**Instead, there’s been unexpected strength thanks to supply disruptions in the US and Kazakhstan — as well as a shunning of sanctioned crude. That’s been amplified by geopolitical risk — starting in Venezuela and extending to Iran — where President Donald Trump could order fresh strikes in a region home to about a quarter of the world’s seaborne oil trade. “You have a potential war, and that’s the overriding factor, but it’s in addition to a much tighter market than people anticipated,” said Gary Ross, a veteran oil consultant turned hedge fund manager at Black Gold Investors LLC. “I would fasten my seatbelt and wouldn’t want to be short in this market.” Trump said in response to reporters’ questions on Friday that he’s considering a limited strike on Iran after amassing the biggest US force since 2003. The number of Brent oil futures held surged to an all-time high this year, while last month saw record trading in options to protect against a further rally. Volatility has surged to the highest since the US last bombed Iran in June, and traders have — for the longest period in years — been charging premiums to protect against a surge. “It does feel that the probability of limited strikes and limited retaliatory strikes from Iran seems less likely this time around,” said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at consultant Rystad Energy AS. “It worked last year, but right now I have the feeling it’s a nuclear deal, or a wider escalation, not something in the middle.” That prices haven’t pushed higher is a sign of how much global output has expanded. US Energy Secretary Chris Wright even said this week that American energy dominance has made the country’s foreign policy less beholden to supply shocks. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies steadily lifted output last year. Likewise, volumes from outside the group also hit a record, leaving global production at 108mn barrels a day at the end of 2025, according to IEA estimates. That’s almost 3mn barrels a day higher than consumption over the same period, its figures show.**media[419804]**Still, the first few weeks of January offered an example of how unexpected output curbs can quickly narrow that gap. Planned exports of Kazakhstan’s CPC Blend crude fell to the lowest level in about a decade due to a combination of drone attacks, maintenance, damage to a production facility and bad weather. At the same time, a deep freeze in the US contributed to two of the four largest declines in American oil inventories this century. Crude stockpiles alone fell by 9mn barrels last week. While output in both countries has since picked up again, the disruption helped to erode western stockpiles at a time when they’d been expected to grow quickly. Physical oil traders are watching the situation in Iran closely, too. Some refiners in Asia, the top consuming region, have begun asking about the availability of cargoes from regions outside of the Gulf in order to cover themselves against the risk of disruption. Earnings for oil supertankers, whose supply was already constrained, have also soared partly in anticipation of a US move. The market’s biggest ships are earning more than $150,000 a day, the most since the pandemic when many of them were deployed to store unwanted barrels. Rates for the ships have been bolstered by tensions in recent days, after Iran claimed earlier this week it briefly closed part of the narrow Strait of Hormuz chokepoint, through which a fifth of the world’s barrels flow. “Right now, the focus is overwhelmingly on Iran and what happens with the Strait of Hormuz,” said Rob Thummel, a portfolio manager at Tortoise Capital Advisors. “That is the billion dollar question.” 

Brent projected to average $61.27 per barrel in 2026WTI to average $58.15 per barrel in 2026Poll was conducted before US-strikes on Venezuela and Opec meetingThe global oil market is ‌likely to be under pressure in 2026 as growing supply and weak ‌demand curb prices, and traders monitor ‍OPEC+ for policy signals and any attempts to bolster the market, a Reuters poll showed on Monday.The ⁠survey of 34 economists and analysts ⁠conducted in December forecast that Brent crude would average $61.27 per barrel in 2026, down from November's ‍forecast of $62.23. US crude is projected to average $58.15 per barrel, below November's estimate of $59.00.The poll was conducted in December 2025, prior to the US military operation that launched strikes on OPEC-member Venezuela and captured its President Nicolas Maduro over the weekend.The poll also preceded a meeting of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies, known as Opec+, at the weekend. It left oil output unchanged on Sunday after ‌a quick meeting that avoided discussion of the political crises affecting several of the producer group's members, not just Venezuela."Holding production steady through Q1 2026 ‍helps limit near-term volatility and provides ⁠some support to prices, ‌but it does not materially alter the underlying surplus. Even with quotas unchanged, supply is expected to exceed demand, keeping prices under pressure through the year," said Bridget Payne, Head of Energy Forecasting at Oxford Economics.Brent and WTI prices declined by about 19% and 20% respectively in 2025, the most since 2020, weighed down by production boosts from Opec+, the US and other producers.Following the weekend's events in Venezuela, crude output in the country, home of the biggest global oil reserves, could gradually increase, oil analysts said, but it will take time."We see ambiguous but modest risks to oil prices in the short run from Venezuela ​depending on how US sanctions ‌policy evolves," Goldman Sachs analysts said in a note dated January 4.On average, the poll participants expect the market to ⁠be in surplus by around 0.5-3.5mn ‍barrels per day in 2026, compared with a 0.5-4.2mn bpd surplus in the previous poll.Opec data published in its most recent monthly report found world oil supply would match demand closely in 2026, an outlook contrasting with projections of a substantial supply surplus from the International Energy Agency.The highest forecast in the poll is from analysts at DBS Bank, ​who expect Brent crude to average $68 next year, as an Opec+ pause and possible new sanctions on Russia could support prices. ABN Amro and Capital Economics have the lowest Brent crude price forecast for 2026 at $55 per barrel, as per the poll.The US has tightened sanctions on Russia's oil trade, targeting tankers and supply routes to curb revenues, but analysts expect US sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil to be short-lived, given US President Donald Trump's push for low gasoline prices.Analysts noted that these sanctions are unlikely to impact the ⁠market, as Opec+'s substantial production increase in 2025 has already ensured ample global supply. 

The global oil market faces an even bigger surplus next year of as much as 4.09mn barrels per day as Opec+ producers and rivals lift output and demand growth slows, the International Energy Agency said on Thursday.The outlook from the IEA, which advises industrialised countries, is the latest warning that the oil market is heading for oversupply. A surplus of 4.09mn bpd would be equal to almost 4% of world demand, and is much larger than other analysts’ predictions.“Global oil market balances are looking increasingly lopsided, as world oil supply is forging ahead while oil demand growth remains modest by historical standards,” the IEA said in its monthly report.Opec+, or the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries plus Russia and other allies, has been boosting output since April. Other producers, such as the US and Brazil, are also increasing supply, adding to glut fears and weighing on prices.Oil prices edged higher to around $63 a barrel after the IEA report to recoup some of the 2% drop on Wednesday after Opec shifted its 2026 outlook to a small surplus, having earlier seen a sizeable deficit.Global oil supply will grow by around 3.1mn bpd in 2025, and 2.5mn bpd next year, each up by around 100,000 bpd on the month, the IEA said.Supply is rising faster than demand in the IEA’s view even after upward revisions on Thursday. The agency now expects oil demand to rise by 770,000 bpd next year, up 70,000 bpd from last month, citing increased needs in petrochemical plants.The short-term outlook in the IEA’s monthly report contrasts with the agency’s annual outlook on Wednesday, which sees global oil and gas demand potentially rising until 2050.Opec sees a surplus of just 20,000 bpd next year according to Reuters calculations based on its own monthly oil market report on Wednesday, although this marks a further retreat from its forecast of a sizeable deficit.Global oil output was 6.2mn bpd higher in October than at the start of this year, divided evenly between Opec+ and non-Opec producers, the IEA said. Top Opec producer Saudi Arabia contributed 1.5mn bpd of the increase, while Russia added just 120,000 bpd amid sanctions and Ukrainian attacks.Russian oil exports have continued largely unabated despite new US sanctions on Russian firms Rosneft and Lukoil, which still may have the most far-reaching impact yet on global oil markets, the IEA said.The IEA added that new entities have already started handling Russian exports as it adapts to sanctions. In October, companies MorExport, RusExport and NNK, which have only been active since May, lifted around 1mn bpd of Russian crude and fuels, it said.The Paris-based IEA also drew attention to a sharp rise in global oil inventories, which rose to their highest since July 2021 in September at just under 8bn barrels.The increase was driven by a sharp increase in waterborne oil in storage, which rose by 80mn barrels in September.Preliminary October data shows further rises for global stocks, again driven by increasing waterborne barrels, the agency added.

As the oil market moves closer to a long-anticipated glut, traders are closely watching buying from China to see if it will absorb an excess that the world’s crude producing nations are set to pump.Earlier this year, China piled into the crude market to snap up millions of barrels, including some that went into its strategic storage. The buildup has since slowed down as the nation’s domestic demand picked up, but with expectations that Beijing will continue to amass barrels, its next steps are seen as critical.With China’s vast network of oil tank farms still a little over 50% full, according to OilX data, traders say another spree would limit the damage from a long-anticipated glut in other parts of the globe. That’s significant because if China’s buying is elevated, it will prevent a buildup of supply in a narrow set of hubs in Midwestern America and Northwest Europe, limiting how far prices can fall.“The key question is where stockbuilds will turn up,” HSBC Holdings Plc analysts including Kim Fustier wrote this week. “If China continues to absorb excess oil volumes via its strategic reserves, as it did in in the second quarter, stockbuilds in the OECD could be muted.”The global market’s capacity to absorb barrels will be among talking points when OPEC+ nations meet to discuss supply on Sunday. Saudi Arabia wants the group to accelerate the return of another tranche of halted output adding to concerns about a surplus that would depress prices but all options are on the table.About 10% of the nation’s crude stockpiling has been directed to its strategic petroleum reserves, according to Kayrros analyst Antoine Halff. There have also been additions to the country’s refining capacity, such as CNOOC Ltd’s Daxie plant, and the addition of new tank space.It’s also possible that Beijing wants to hold more barrels in storage given the heightened levels of geopolitical risks over the last few years, the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies wrote in a note.While China’s flagship crude futures contract was flashing a softer market over recent weeks, the world’s two main benchmark’s continued to suggest relatively tight supplies.That’s because inventory builds so far this year have avoided western hubs. In Cushing, Oklahoma, the tank farm of about 15 storage terminals that underpins the West Texas Intermediate futures contract, inventories have been repeatedly near multi-year seasonal lows this year.The International Energy Agency says that in the second quarter global oil stockpiles increased by the most since the third three months of 2020, when the global economy was still being ravaged by the Covid-19 pandemic. Over that period, stockpiles in the developed world climbed by 60,000 barrels a day, while expanding by more than 1mn barrels a day everywhere else.It’s still possible that prices will need to fall from current levels for China buy in a big way, though, according to Frederic Lasserre, head of research at Gunvor Group.“The last solver that everybody is talking about is China,” he said. “Not for runs, but because we’ve seen a recent trend of them being willing to build up crude barrels. But if you expect China to go back to stockpiling 1mn barrels a day, you need a big price drop to incentivise it.”Both inside and outside of China there’s plenty of space to store unwanted oil.Bank of America Corp wrote last month that there’s about a billion barrels of empty tank capacity available across the globe to fill with inventories, which could mean that markets avoid falling into a heavily bearish structure.There are signs that the surge in production is starting to come, though. Brazil’s output approached 4mn barrels a day for the first time over the summer, and a new field is due to start in the country before the end of the year. Guyana has moved from producing nothing to almost 1mn barrels a day and output in Canada’s oil heartland of Alberta hit a record in July.At the same time, despite concerns about a decline in US output, the Energy Information Administration has consistently revised oil supply estimates higher over the last few months.What traders are waiting for now, is for those increases to appear at key storage hubs.“When we look at OECD inventories we’re still at a relatively low level,” Nadia Martin Wiggen, a director at Svelland Capital, said in a Bloomberg TV interview. “Yes, there is this supply glut coming according to expectations, but we need to see that materialising.”

Oil prices fell on Friday as traders looked toward weaker demand in the US, the world's largest oil market, and a boost in supply this autumn from OPEC and its allies. Brent crude futures for October delivery, which expired on Friday, settled at $68.12 a barrel, down 50 cents.West Texas Intermediate crude futures settled at $64.01, down 59 cents. The market was in part shifting its focus toward next week's OPEC+ meeting.Crude output has increased from OPEC+, as the group has accelerated output hikes to regain market share, raising the supply outlook and weighing on global oil prices. Meanwhile, the US summer driving season ends on Monday's Labor Day holiday, signalling the end of the highest demand period in the country, which is the largest fuel market.Crude supply increases have yet to reach the US market, raising the prospect of a tighter balance between supply and demand. Earlier in the week, prices rose on news of Ukrainian attacks against Russian oil export terminals, but reports of ceasefire discussions between Ukraine’s European allies helped ease the upward pressure.US crude inventories for the week ending August 22 posted larger-than-expected draws, suggesting late-summer demand remained firm, especially across industrial and freight-related sectors. Meanwhile, analysts noted that investors are closely watching India’s response to US pressure to curb purchases of Russian oil.GasAsian spot LNG prices slipped last week on muted demand and ample supply, with the delivery of an LNG cargo from a sanctioned Russian project adding to supply concerns. The average LNG price for October delivery into Northeast Asia was at $11.15 per mmBtu, down from $11.40 per mmBtu last week, industry sources estimated. LNG market sentiment remained calm with arbitrage for US cargoes still Europe-bound.Major Northeast Asian buyers have limited interest in prompt cargoes due to high stocks and a relatively loosened Pacific balance. The risk of Russia's Arctic LNG 2 ramping up LNG exports has significantly increased with the first unloading of a cargo from the facility in China.A full, sustained ramp-up of the first two trains at Arctic LNG 2 is a significant downside risk to Asian spot LNG prices. The Arctic LNG 2 cargo delivery has weighed on Chinese demand expectations for spot LNG, freeing up spot supply elsewhere. Additional supply from new projects is putting downward pressure on prices.Besides ramp-ups from Plaquemines in the US, new projects like LNG Canada, Greater Tortue Ahmeyim offshore West Africa and Congo LNG could add around 0.5mn tons per month in July and August, while the return of Norway's Hammerfest LNG after being offline since May represents a recovery of around 400,000 tons per month. In Europe, the Dutch TTF hub settled at $10.74 per mmBtu, recording a weekly loss of more than 6%.