tag

Brazilian presidential candidates will on Thursday have one of their final opportunities to reach voters ahead of Sunday's election as TV Globo, the country's largest free-to-air broadcaster, hosts its traditional end-of-campaign debate.The event, however, will take place without President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who has skipped all debates this year as he seeks an unprecedented fourth term.The leftist president, who has led every major poll for Sunday's first-round vote, has avoided sharing the stage with a field dominated by right-wing candidates who could concentrate their attacks on him as he sets his sights on a likely runoff against Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, his main challenger."I don't go to debates to listen to nonsense. If the debate isn't helpful to the public, why should I go just to respond to trash talk?" Lula said in July.Once a hallmark of Brazilian democracy following the end of the country's 21-year military dictatorship in 1985, televised presidential debates have lost relevance as leading candidates have increasingly chosen to stay away.Lula, who is running for president for the seventh time, also declined to participate in the last debate before the first round of his 2006 reelection campaign, a decision that drew widespread criticism at the time.Rivals have accused Lula of dodging scrutiny over his administration. His absence has also kept Flavio Bolsonaro, the eldest son of former president Jair Bolsonaro, away from debates."My only opponent in this campaign is Lula. He's the one I want to debate," the lawmaker said earlier this week.Two debates on other networks were cancelled after both declined to attend.This time, however, Flavio Bolsonaro has confirmed he will participate in Thursday's debate, where he is likely to appeal to undecided voters, promote his platform and criticise the president.Lula instead plans to appear on a podcast at the same time.Three other right-of-centre candidates — author-psychiatrist Augusto Cury, former Goias Governor Ronaldo Caiado, and former Minas Gerais Governor Romeu Zema — are also expected to take part in the debate.A Quaest survey this week showed Lula with 39% support for the first round and Bolsonaro with 34%, followed a long way behind by Caiado (4%), Cury (4%), Renan Santos (3%) and Zema (1%). Lula and Bolsonaro were seen tied at 42% each in a simulated runoff."I wanted Lula to go to the debate," Caiado wrote on social media. "I wanted to look him in the eye and debate two things that worry Brazilians: security and corruption." 

Qatar Foundation’s Doha Debates has launched a new season of Doha Debates Podcast with 20 episodes airing weekly through February 16, 2027. The series brings leading global thinkers together to debate some of the world’s most complex and challenging issues.The Doha Debates Podcast carries forward themes from its flagship debates and town halls through long-form conversations spanning disciplines, countries and worldviews. Each moderated discussion reflects Doha Debates’ commitment to open, truth-seeking dialogue that explores global issues with depth, nuance and respect for diverse perspectives.The opening episode, “Will China or the West lead the world into the future?” moderated by Soraya Salam, brought together Renata Ávila, CEO of the Open Knowledge Foundation; Arnaud Bertrand, entrepreneur; Isabel Hilton, visiting professor at the Lau China Institute, King's College, London; and Henry Wang, founder and president of the Centre for China and Globalisation, to examine the contest over influence, technology and the international order.For much of the past century, Western powers have played an outsized role in shaping that order. China’s growing economic, technological and diplomatic influence is challenging that balance.This episode asked whether Western influence is really in decline. Does China offer a genuine alternative, or a different set of dependencies? And with tensions over Taiwan, the war in Ukraine and the race for artificial intelligence reshaping geopolitics, can competing visions of global order coexist?Wang says we are “at a crossroads” as the global order shifts “from a unipolar world to a multipolar world.”“Yet the multipolar system is not there. So I think right now, the daunting task is that we have to get the major players to work together,” he says.Hilton cautions against reducing the debate to a simple moral binary. “I do think that if we regard the world as one side good, the other side bad, we’re really not serving the conversation,” she says.Bertrand argues that the differences between China and the West need not be irreconcilable. “We need to find a way to coexist and to accept each other as others,” he says.Ávila looks beyond the major powers, saying she hopes to see “a different configuration of countries — a little bit like the Non-Aligned Movement did back in the days — that could have enough weight to tame the powerful.” 

Football fans embody club loyalty that no boardroom can manufacture. But as global capital reshapes the world’s most-watched sport, who it belongs to is increasingly contested. This question is at the heart of Qatar Foundation’s latest Doha Debates town hall, “Football fandom: Community or commodity?”, now available on Doha Debates and Al Jazeera Digital platforms.  The episode was filmed at The Terminal Theatre in Toronto in partnership with the Qatar, Canada and Mexico 2026 Year of Culture, a national initiative that builds lasting relationships between countries by creating spaces where people can meet and learn from different perspectives. This Doha Debates collaboration brought that purpose to life through a conversation connecting young people across borders.  Moderated by journalist Imran Garda, the Majlis-style debate brought together Shireen Ahmed, senior contributor at CBC Sports; David Goldblatt, a football historian and sociologist and Kely Nascimento, president of the Nascimento Foundation, to explore the sport’s evolution. Twenty students from Qatar, Canada, Mexico and beyond joined the discussion. Goldblatt held firm that football—and its fans—cannot be bought or sold: “Football clubs should not be privately owned by anyone. They shouldn’t be owned by states, or by rich men or rich women. They are collective forms of cultural capital,” he said. Nascimento, a documentary filmmaker and the daughter of football legend Pelé, challenged that position, questioning whether football was necessarily healthier before the influx of wealth. “I did some research into what it was like before the money. It didn’t seem like it was that great,” she said, going on to question whether Goldblatt’s stance was more of a utopian idea than reality. Ahmed challenged her fellow debaters to more closely examine where the money is coming from and how it is used. “This discussion that money is bad in all cases—it’s nuanced, and it’s complicated. So I would rather have accountability for that money and transparency,” she said. The students added other relevant dimensions to the debate. “I wonder why the working class have difficulties attending, and it’s not accessible for them to attend Premier League matches,” said Nawaf Al-Kuwari, a naval architecture and marine engineering graduate from the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow.  It seems to me like it’s more of a luxury than it is accessible.”   Regina Aldrete, an international relations student at Tecnológico de Monterrey University, commented on the game’s political nature. “Football is inherently political. Therefore, it is like a mirror of society,” she said, pointing to tensions surrounding football matches between El Salvador and Honduras as an example of how the sport can reflect global conflict.  For Amjad Atallah, managing director of Doha Debates, the conversation reflected Doha Debates’ commitment to in-depth examination of timely topics. “Very few things hold a billion people's attention at once–fewer still spark this much passionate debate. In Toronto, our expert guests and students refused the easy answer, and that is what truth-seeking looks like.” He added: “We’re proud to have built this debate with the Qatar, Canada and Mexico 2026 Year of Culture, an initiative that shares our belief in the value of cultural exchange. We invite audiences everywhere to watch it, and decide for themselves where they stand.” “Football fandom: Community or commodity?” is part of Doha Debates’ global town hall series, which brings young people and experts together for Majlis-style, truth-seeking dialogue on complex global issues. 

Doha Debates, part of Qatar Foundation is reshaping global discourse, refining its truth-seeking mission, amplifying youth and Global South voices, and expanding internationally in 2026.Amjad Atallah, managing director, Doha Debates told Gulf Times that the organisation is “doubling down on a simple idea: truth-seeking dialogue in a respectful majlis setting”.**media[439415]**“In a world where too many conversations are engineered for heat rather than light, we’re refining our mission around calm, rigorous exchange,” Atallah said. “We’re bringing expert voices from across regions and disciplines into the same space and asking the questions that will shape our shared future, not just the next news cycle.”In the context of recent regional instability, the importance of informed, measured dialogue becomes even more pronounced. Atallah added that Doha Debates encourages audiences to engage with global developments thoughtfully, equipping them to form their own perspectives through critical thinking and open exchange, rather than reaction.A central part of that recalibration is widening the lens of global dialogue by placing youth at the centre. According to Atallah, when students engage directly with leading thinkers, debates are forced to confront both present realities and long-term consequences.“That multi-generational perspective is one of the clearest gaps in global discourse, and one we’re committed to addressing,” he said.At a time when public disagreement often descends into hostility, Atallah stressed that respectful debate remains indispensable. “Respectful debate is one of the few methods we have for getting closer to understanding,” he said. “When people can make their case clearly, and others can test it without ridicule or shouting, you start to see a more complete picture, not as a slogan, but as something you can examine from multiple angles.”**media[439416]**Stewarding such conversations, however, presents challenges. The issue, he explained, is not controversy itself. “Serious ideas deserve public scrutiny,” he noted. The greater difficulty lies in overcoming a media culture that rewards spectacle.“Modern media has conditioned audiences to treat debate as gladiator sport,” Atallah said. “We want discussions that are fair, well-prepared and intellectually honest, while maintaining nuance and complexity, without reducing difficult topics into binaries.”Ensuring representation also remains critical. Doha Debates actively platforms voices from Qatar, West Asia and the wider Global South alongside perspectives from the Global North.“If you only platform Western issues, you can narrow the global conversation,” he said. “Bring the rest of the world into the conversation and you develop perspective.”Topic selection follows overarching themes that resonate across cultures: grand narratives shaping how societies interpret the world, the meaning of freedom, and the enduring significance of family. These, Atallah explained, are “meaning of life” questions, globally relevant yet deeply personal.Youth participation remains foundational. More than 400 young people from around 80 countries engage annually through its programmes, supported by a digital community exceeding seven million followers.“Young people aren’t just audiences, they are stakeholders,” Atallah said. “When you offer them serious conversation, they show up prepared, thoughtful and willing to wrestle with complexity.”Participants gain transferable skills beyond traditional education, including critical thinking, argumentation, active listening and the ability to “disagree without dehumanising others.”“The world is not short on opinions,” he added. “It’s short on people who can reason through hard questions with clarity and respect.”In an increasingly crowded media landscape, Doha Debates deliberately creates space for slower, more considered discussion. “Our format lets audiences hear competing arguments in full and see how a strong claim holds up under scrutiny,” he said, emphasising the importance of skilled moderation.A recent town hall on superintelligence exemplified this approach. During the debate, Roman Yampolskiy, Professor, Computer Scientist and AI Safety Researcher, presented a stark warning about existential risks linked to advanced AI.“You could feel the room shift, not into panic, but into nervous surprise,” Atallah recalled. “What stayed with me was how the conversation remained rigorous and human. They met a frightening possibility with calm reasoning.”Being based in Qatar, he noted, fundamentally shapes the organisation's tone. “Qatar gives us a distinct cultural foundation for dialogue, the spirit of the majlis, hospitality and respect. Listening is a form of strength,” he said, adding that the ongoing regional situation has underscored the importance of dialogue grounded in patience, perspective, and mutual respect. “It not only shapes Doha Debates but reflects a broader commitment to dialogue that resonates globally,” he added.Looking ahead to 2026, Doha Debates plans to expand its global town hall programme, grow its Ambassador Programme, continue weekly episodes of its podcast, and film a new season of its flagship show. 

Doha Debates, an initiative of Qatar Foundation, examined the ethical, political and social ramifications of the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) during its latest “town hall”, held amid growing concerns that AI’s accelerating power could surpass human capability and escape meaningful control. Hosted at Multaqa, the Education City Student Center, the open forum brought together students, researchers and global experts to explore whether current institutions, ethical frameworks and governance systems are prepared for an era of fast-moving technological transformation. Moderated by Nadir Nahdi, the session featured strategic philosopher and transhumanist thinker Max More; Dr Roman Yampolskiy, professor of computer science and a leading expert on AI safety and security; and Nabiha Syed, executive director of the Mozilla Foundation and a prominent advocate for accountable technology governance. Approaching the issue from sharply different perspectives, the speakers debated whether advanced artificial intelligence represents an unprecedented opportunity for human flourishing or a profound threat to the core of human agency. Reflecting a proactionary outlook, Max More urged humanity to resist paralysis driven by fear, stressing the importance of innovation grounded in reason and reinforced by proportional safeguards. He warned that risk and opportunity are emerging simultaneously as AI capabilities expand. By contrast, Dr Roman Yampolskiy expressed deep scepticism about the possibility of maintaining real control over systems that exceed human intelligence, cautioning that governance structures may collapse as the intelligence gap widens and power becomes increasingly asymmetric. From a societal perspective, Nabiha Syed focused on how decisions around artificial intelligence are made, questioning who benefits and who bears the consequences when these technologies are deployed unevenly across societies. She called for stronger accountability, transparency and public participation, particularly at a time when fears are rising without a clear vision for maximising benefits while minimising harm. Students from universities across Qatar played an active role in shaping the discussion, raising questions related to work, human dignity, surveillance, the meaning of existence and the future of human control in a world where artificial intelligence may become inexpensive and widely accessible. Doha Debates announced that the town hall episode will be broadcast online on February 17. The organisation also revealed that a new episode of The Negotiators podcast, recorded during the Doha Forum and focused on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, will be released on February 2, followed by a new Doha Debates podcast episode on superheroes on February 10.

Qatar Foundation's Doha Debates, in collaboration with Qatar's Years of Culture, a national initiative that brings people together through cultural exchange, has released its first Latin America town hall, "How Should We Reinvent the City"Held at Buenos Aires' Usina del Arte, the event brought together students from Argentina, Chile, and Qatar, alongside global experts, to explore the future of urban life.Moderated by Malika Bilal, the debate featured Guadalupe Granero Realini, urban economist and researcher at CIPPEC Think Tank; Akel Ismail Kahera, program director and professor of Islamic architecture and urbanism at Hamad Bin Khalifa University; and Nicholas Boys Smith, founding director of Create Streets (UK). Students contributed questions and reflections, highlighting intergenerational and cross-cultural dialogue.His Excellency Advisor on Latin America for the Years of Culture Mohammed Al Kuwari said: "In Arab culture, dialogue has always been at the heart of community life, from the tradition of the majlis to the exchange of ideas. Debate is about listening, learning, and finding common ground more than simply winning or losing. "Managing Director of Doha Debates Amjad Atallah said: "Bringing students from different regions into the same conversation creates space for serious questioning and mutual understanding. Partnering with Years of Culture for this town hall reflects our shared belief that dialogue across cultures deepens how young people engage with the ideas shaping their societies."As for students reflecting on the program's impact, Jamila Al Humaidi from Qatar said the experience was proof that honest conversation is the bridge that connects us. Camila Regueiro, from Argentina, added, "I truly think we all learned so much about each other's culture. " Chilean student, Javiera Eugenin Guzmán, noted, "This experience made me feel heard and reminded me of the deep connections that unite us across countries."The expert guests praised the students' engagement, as Akel Ismail Kahera said, "The youth showed maturity and deep understanding of sustainability, urban planning, and globalinequities." Guadalupe Granero Realini added, "Their ability to debate fearlessly and challenge experts was impressive."

Qatar Foundation’s Doha Debates brings together global thinkers and students for a thought-provoking conversation on whether hard work and talent still determine who rises, or whether “earned success” conceals deeper inequities.Daniel Markovits, Guido Calabresi, professor of law at Yale Law School, argues that the system meant to promote fairness has instead entrenched inequality.“Meritocracy has become the principal obstacle to equality of opportunity, at least in the rich countries of the world,” he says, warning that competition built on elite education and inherited advantage has replaced real mobility.Bryan Caplan, professor of economics at George Mason University, offers a contrasting view. “Meritocracy is pretty real if we actually had open borders where anyone could work anywhere,” he says. For Caplan, prosperity depends on personal responsibility and freedom of movement, not structural intervention.From a human-centred perspective, Dr Poornima Luthra, associate professor at Copenhagen Business School, challenges the idea that opportunity is equally accessible.“Meritocracy is a belief, a system where people are assumed to have opportunity solely on merit,” she says.“In reality, people experience bias and discrimination across many aspects of their identity.”Offering a global outlook, Parag Khanna, founder and CEO of AlphaGeo, sees potential in redefining meritocracy. “Meritocracy can work if the most qualified people are making decisions about the shape and direction of society,” he says, citing governance models that reward expertise and mobility.Adding their voices, students from universities across Qatar reflect on how these ideas resonate with their generation. Sundus Saeed, 26, a social sciences student at Hamad Bin Khalifa University, says, “The system often ensures that people stay out, and if someone rises, hurdles are placed in their way to maintain the status quo.” Carl Jambo, 22, studying international economics at Georgetown University in Qatar, takes an opposing view, saying: “Meritocracy gives you the platform to prove yourself, an individual against the world.”

Legal PerspectiveTo regulate and streamline the companies process, the intention of the legislature generally speaking, was that the company’s objects should be set out very precise and succinctly. This issue raised many legal and operational debates due to its importance for companies.Mainly, the idea is that the promoters should simply specify in general terms the business they intend to carry on during the tenure of the company. In this respect, the powers of the company which may be required as incidental to that businesspower are not intended to be specified as these would be implied by law.In fact, for long time, the courts have interpreted the legal provisions in a liberal spirit and agreed that everything reasonably incidental to the specified objects or powers of the company will be intra vires and not ultra vires. As a result, there is considerable body of case law deciding what powers will be implied in case of particular types of enterprise and the activities that can be regarded as reasonably incidental to others.However, many business owners show some reluctance in leaving matters to implication, they preferred to set out in the memorandum the ancillary powers which specify only the business which they thought they would need. Moreover, they were not content to specify only the business which the company was initially intended to follow, but preferred also to name and specify all other businesses which they might conceivably want to turn to in the future of the company.Generally, they put this in a very general term as, “and other powers that are ancillary to the main objects of the company”. Due to this, memorandums became far from simplicity as they contain statements of too many objects and also other ancillary powers covering every conceivable and all incidental powers which might be needed to accomplish them. This at least makes it less hazardous to enter into transactions with a company for the likelihood of their being ultra vires is remote.On the other hand, it offers little assurance of the preservation of the company’s assets and less control over the activities of directors, surprisingly at it may seem. As ironically stated by some parties in the business, “The modern gold mining co”, may quite have powers under the memorandum to operate fried-fish shops or grocery outlets. Or, a licensed bank to undertake aviation services or transportation commuting facilities. However, I believe, this is too far and out of context and for sure this kind of activities would be ultra vires with all relevant harsh legal consequences.To conclude, companies and directors shall endeavour to work intra vires and within the specific direct objects of the company and not to detour out of the route as this could easily end up as ultra vires, which could be very costly for both the company and likewise the Directors of the company. Hence, we urge all types of companies, small or big, to be very aware of their direct clear intra vires objectives. Moreover, the regulatory authorities shall keep an open vigilant eye all through, to make sure that “business is in order”. Dr AbdelGadir Warsama Ghalib is a corporate legal counsel. Email: [email protected]

Qatar Foundation’s (QF) Doha Debates has welcomed a new cohort of 195 young leaders from across the globe into its ambassador programme.Furthering Doha Debates’ goal of empowering young people to bridge differences and build consensus through constructive debate, participants in the Doha Debates Ambassador Programme learn to engage in intercultural dialogue and generate solutions to the world’s most timely and complex issues.At the start of the 12-week programme, ambassadors join an online community of practice guided by facilitation and intercultural communication expert Dr Brandon Ferderer, systems-thinking specialist Jennifer Geist, and several international guest speakers.Participants will build critical communication, systems-thinking, and consensus-building skills to prepare them for the second half of the programme, where they work in small teams to produce a Majlis-style debate that examines a global issue of concern to their generation.As well as acquiring valuable intercultural communication tools and techniques, ambassadors form lifelong connections with their peers and often engage with Doha Debates long after the programme concludes. Programme graduates have participated in live debates and town halls, podcasts and other special events. A group of 20 alumni will mentor the incoming cohort.Alumni have also created their own community projects showcasing the skills they acquired in the programme and reflecting its majlis-style approach. Former ambassador Ahmed Berramdane hosted Majlis-style workshops at the American Cultural Center Algiers, while Murshidul Alam Bhuiyan launched the Human Heroes Project, a space for authentic story-sharing to bridge divides. Meanwhile, Ayomide Emmanuel Akinwale, Rami Mroueh, Fils Jean Pierre Mutsinzi, Hafsa Rasheed, and Azra Shahab co-created a global affairs podcast promoting peaceful dialogue among youth.This cohort represents 68 countries across six continents, including Iraq, Somalia, India, Nigeria, Kenya, Afghanistan, Qatar, the US, and the UK. Many are current students or alumni of QF partner universities.“We warmly welcome our seventh cohort into the Doha Debates Ambassador Programme,” said Amjad Atallah, managing director of Doha Debates.