Chinese financial assistance, which in recent years has immensely helped Islamabad in meeting its pressing needs, is one of the main reasons for the delay in the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) bailout package for Pakistan.
The IMF’s conditions for signing the deal with Pakistan include sharing details of Chinese loans, increasing the power tariff, adjustments in the exchange rate and fiscal policies and imposition of taxes. These have been the sticking points since November last year, said government sources.
However, the media has primarily remained focused on the conditions about the exchange rate policy and electricity prices.
The IMF has not backed out from its demand of a complete disclosure of all types of financial cooperation between Pakistan and China, sources in the finance ministry.
The economic co-operation between Beijing and Islamabad is not only limited to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Pakistan has launched projects of national importance with Chinese assistance including those related to infrastructure development, nuclear power plants, joint manufacturing of JF-17 Thunder fighter aircraft and procurement of submarines.
Besides, China has provided commercial loans to Pakistan. Over $6.5bn in commercial loans have been provided to the country in the past two and a half years alone. In July, China also deposited $2bn with the State Bank of Pakistan.
The sources said that it was impossible for Pakistan to share the details of every Chinese loan with the IMF and that was prolonging the talks.
Pakistan began formal engagements with the IMF in September last year and negotiations have continued for the past eight months, making them the country’s most protracted talks with the global lender.
Finance Minister Asad Umar had vowed that he would be able to clinch a deal during his current visit to Washington. But there has been no announcement so far and the minister would return to Pakistan at the weekend.
The military establishment has already declared the economy a matter of national security.
The National Security Council has also raised apprehensions over the implications of the IMF deal on CPEC.
On April 5, three days before Umar’s departure to Washington, three US Congress members wrote a letter to US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. They opposed the IMF bailout package for Pakistan seeking “transparency” in CPEC financing deals.
In October last year, Umar said Pakistan would share “normal debt-related information about CPEC with the IMF”. But that did not satisfy the global lender, which demanded a complete disclosure and the matter remained under discussion during face-to-face meetings and video conferences, the sources said.
Later in the same month, the finance minister said the US had only 16.5% voting rights and the decision on Pakistan’s request would be taken by the IMF’s executive board with a 51% majority vote.
Dr Khaqan Najeeb, adviser and spokesperson for the finance ministry, said that debt sustainability and managing the twin deficits at sustainable levels continued to be the focus of “productive” engagements with the IMF.
The global lender is seeking the details of all Chinese loans for an accurate analysis of Pakistan’s debt sustainability. In its recent report, the IMF has estimated that the country’s debt-to-GDP ratio would peak to over 83% by 2023.
Pakistan’s debt sustainability indicators have significantly worsened during the past two years - some have already crossed the red line including short-term debt and maturing debt within a year.
Pakistan and China have signed about half a dozen loan projects worth $6.2bn under CPEC. However, the IMF is seeking details of energy sector loans and financing of projects related to defence.
Pakistan and China have taken a unanimous position that power sector projects are in the private sector with an overall debt-equity ratio of 75:25.
The private loans are normally for a term of 10-12 years and a grace period of 2-4 years. Infrastructure projects are financed through concessional bilateral loans from China for 20 years and a grace period of five years.
The range of interest rate for loan-financed infrastructure projects is between 2% and 5.2%.
The buyer-credit loan rate stands at 5.2% while for government concessional and preferential buyer-credit loans, the interest rate is 2%.
CPEC envisages projects in various sectors with a total financial outlay of around $49bn and $34bn in the energy sector.
In 2015, the IMF sought the financing details of the K2 and K3 nuclear power plants that China is financing through a $6.7bn loan. However, the then finance minister, Ishaq Dar, refused to provide them to the global lender.
Pakistan formally requested the IMF for a bailout package during the IMF-World Bank annual meetings held in Indonesia in October when it gave a letter of intent for a three-year extended fund facility programme
During staff-level programme talks, Pakistan claimed covering 80% of ground but during the past five months, it has failed to make progress in the remaining 20%.
Prime Minister Imran Khan held a meeting with Christine Lagarde, the managing director of the IMF, on the sidelines of the World Government Summit in Dubai in February but that also did not help in breaking the logjam.
LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*
QDB highlights Qatar’s efforts in dealing with Covid impact on business sector
Thailand’s Islamic bank doubles branches; Cambodia gets takaful option
Turkish state banks handed lead role to boost economy
Iraq oil sales slump in May, but revenues up
China halts some American farm imports, threatening trade deal
Lockdown exit optimism helps India stocks extend winning streak; rupee up
Europe’s factories starting to recover, Asia’s pain worsens
QST to host 1st ‘Digital Demo Day’ on June 8
GCC pegged exchange rate regimes likely to remain in place: S&P