When cars exit the tunnel of the next 15 years, they’ll be like giant smartphones.
Their sensors will capture sight, sound and motion and transmit the information to the internet quickly and affordably. The $100 billion app economy built on data from smartphones would look small compared with the $750 billion in revenue produced around cars.
The forecast has automakers buzzing. As they accelerate spending on developing self-driving cars, they’re devoting enormous attention on what to do with data that those high-tech devices generate — beyond making the drive automated. Among the possibilities: selling details about driving patterns to real estate developers or using it in personalised insurance calculations.
But the road to such a future could be more treacherous than traditional giants of the auto industry expect. They’re assuming the costs of sensors will fall enough to justify data collection efforts. They’re betting they can easily transfer the data, though it could be thousands of times the volume discharged by smartphones. And they’re hoping their role — and moneymaking potential — in the new realm isn’t marginalised.
The challenge comes from Silicon Valley breathing down the neck of the old guard. Younger auto rivals Tesla Motors, NextEV, Faraday Future and even Apple could have a head start on reinventing the technical guts of cars to pair with smartphone-grade software.
Automakers tell NextEV US Chief Executive Padmasree Warrior that they’re bulking up software development teams. The former chief technology officer at Cisco Systems and Motorola tells them that’s good, but not sufficient.
“Because of the heritage they have, it’s hard to say, ‘How can I build this from ground zero?’” Warrior said in an interview at the LA Auto Show. “They are trying to look at it as, ‘Can I just get the software and put it on an existing hardware platform,’ and I’m (making) the point it never works that way.”
The full package will come together for some, technologists say. But their concern is that the likes of Ford, Toyota and others are underestimating obstacles. What seems five years away could be 10 years out, and business and strategy executives are jumping the gun on technology development teams.
“To implement data-based business models, cars need to look like cellphones,” said Josh Hartung, chief executive of automotive software startup PolySync.
Hartung founded the Portland, Oregon, company to close the sophistication-gap. PolySync’s software aggregates data from lasers, radar and cameras on the car. Organising it is meant to help apps harness the data as easily as smartphone operating systems do.
Apple software “is the meat in the middle” for smartphones, Hartung said. But “there’s nothing like that” to turn cars into feature-rich devices.
Genivi, an alliance of auto parts companies, is tackling similar issues. It’s working with leading online technology groups on standards that would enable app makers to write one program and have it function across many vehicles. Without that simplicity, potential buyers for car data may be scared away. But wide adoption of standards isn’t certain.
“That’s the biggest hurdle,” said Rudolf Streif, system architect at Jaguar Land Rover, a Genivi member.
Tech experts think they can get over the smaller ones. Sensor costs and sizes need to fall, so cars don’t end up expensive, ugly robots. Without the evolution, there won’t be much data to pick at.
The concerns are “definitely in the category of things you can get over in the next couple of years or next five years,” said Sanjay Ravi, Microsoft’s worldwide managing director for automotive, aerospace and other manufacturing industries.
Same goes for modernising mobile telecommunications networks so that a large volume of automotive data can reach online storage. Tesla’s cars already turn minutes-long uploads into seconds-long tasks, and other carmakers are sure to try to follow.
Audi, BMW and others recently launched an alliance with mobile networking technology providers to hammer out infrastructure ideas. But no services were among launch partners, and their initial upgrades may take years to get past big cities. That could significantly slow the adoption of data businesses that require consistent online communication.
To compensate for data limits and connectivity issues, automakers want to shift some data processing to the car. The idea is that self-driving and other features could be powered by artificial intelligence software without an internet connection.
Small updates would occasionally transfer between the car and the internet, informing and allowing for updates to the software. But this so-called system of fog computing remains untested at the imagined scale.
Even if fog computing works, some data will have to be stored online. That means automakers have to prepare for boosting spending on storage, said Intel’s Doug Davis, senior vice president and general manager of a division dealing with cutting-edge mobile devices.
“It’s a realisation I got to do this,” Davis said. “I have to build significant data-centre capacity.”
Securing that data from hackers looms as a new charge for automakers. They’ll also have to find new teams to actually analyse any data they want to spin into uses for their own business. Prioritising what to build — whether it be tools tied to roadside assistance or ride-hailing advertising — is taking up significant thought, Ravi said.
About 30 data-related business opportunities could produce up to $750 billion in annual revenue worldwide by 2030, consulting firm McKinsey estimated in a September report, comparing it to a forecast of $5 trillion in traditional auto sales.
Tech startups think they’ll have an advantage in the ecosystem, with carmakers leaning on their expertise. It’s already starting to show, with a flood of acquisitions and investments for companies focusing on specific pieces of technology.
But “the only companies that win in the future will be the ones that work on the entire” process, from developing hardware to hawking data, NextEV’s Warrior said during an industry presentation.
Other industries, including retail and entertainment, face the same problems as the auto world in reaching their big-data visions. But in automakers’ heads, the stakes are unequal because self-driving cars could save lives. It’s that sentiment that gives them optimism that they’ll quickly get past challenges and significantly alter the transportation business.
“It’s good to fantasise and reach for the stars,” Jaguar’s Streif said. “Even if the stars are out of reach, there are a lot of opportunities in between, and they are only discovered if you think bigger.” —Los Angeles Times/TNS

Related Story