China has agreed to scrap export subsidies on a range of products from metals to agriculture and textiles, the US said yesterday, in a step by Beijing to reduce trade frictions with Washington.
China is to end a program known as its “demonstration bases-common service platform,” which provides export subsidies to Chinese companies in seven economic sectors, the US trade representative’s office said.
Some industry figures were skeptical about the deal’s impact, especially regarding steel, which has been a flashpoint with Chinese overcapacity pressuring US suppliers. One source knowledgeable about the agreement said it was not comprehensive enough to do much to help the US steel industry, given its focus was only on specialty products.
The US had filed a complaint with the World Trade Organisation about the programme, alleging unfair practices by China.
“The victory that the US secured will help level the playing field for everyone from medical device makers in California, to textile workers in North Carolina, to those in the shrimp industry along the Gulf Coast,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.
The Chinese industries that have received the subsidies under the program include textiles, light industry, specialty chemicals, medical products, hardware, agriculture and advanced materials and metals, including specialty steel and aluminium products, the trade representative’s office said.
“It’s a good thing in moving China in the right direction, but it won’t make a big difference in the trade balance,” said James Lewis, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Since it joined the WTO in 2001, China has frequently drawn complaints that its exports are being “dumped,” or sold at unfairly cheap prices on foreign markets.
The US steel industry is under huge pressure this year from cheap imports, a strong dollar, and falling oil prices, which have decimated demand for steel tubes used by the oil and gas industry.
US Steel Corp President and Chief Executive Mario Longhi said he was cautious about the latest Chinese move. “People can say whatever they want, and I think China has been saying a lot of things for the past couple of decades,” Longhi told reporters in Washington. “You need to ask yourself what, from a practical perspective, is really happening. We need to see the proof in actions, not just in verbiage.”
Last year, the US trade office estimated that suppliers of subsidised services to Chinese exporters received more than $1bn from their government over three years.
While China is ending some subsidies, there are still other forms of support for industry in place that critics could point to, including relatively cheap and easy credit from state banks, state-regulated power prices that have often favoured industry, and low prices for other inputs such as water.
“While it is clearly an important result, it is only one feature in a universe of other measures that China foresees for its steel sector,” said Karl Tachelet, trade director at European steel industry body EUROFER.
“These include direct subsidies, soft loans from state banks, VAT (value-added tax) rebates on some product categories, energy and input subsidies, and occasionally direct grants, among others,” he said. Wall Street shrugged off news of the agreement, with stocks in related sectors showing a mixed bag of results. Around midday, Alcoa Inc was up 2%, and Freeport-McMoRan Inc fell 1.2% while US Steel Corp shed 0.3%. International Monetary Fund Director Christine Lagarde, in Washington for meetings of the IMF and World Bank, said the lifting of the export subsidies was a positive sign that Chinese leaders appear committed to pursuing economic reforms.
A worker drives a forklift to transport aluminium bars at a factory in Anshun, Guizhou province. China has agreed to scrap controversial export subsidies on a range of products from steel and aluminium to agriculture and textiles, US Trade Representative Michael Froman said yesterday.