Now that researchers have identified a tangible link between the Zika virus and foetal brain deformation, pregnant women and those of childbearing age in the Latin American countries hardest hit by the mosquito-borne virus will have to make tough decisions about their reproductive future.
In reality, women in many Latin American countries are subject to rampant sexual violence, have received little or no sex education and may have limited access to birth control. When they do get pregnant, abortion is illegal in most countries, though some have exceptions in cases of rape, foetal impairment or danger to the life of the mother. In El Salvador the strictures are particularly harsh. There are no legal abortions, and women may go to jail for the “crime” of suffering miscarriage.
These realities make the paltry governmental response in El Salvador and like-minded countries – warning women not to get pregnant until the Zika crisis is over – all the more ludicrous. Just how does it help to scare women while offering no tools or information? It’s unrealistic, and even irresponsible, to expect women to somehow stave off pregnancy when birth control isn’t an option and rape is widespread.
The World Health Organisation declared Zika an international public health threat on February 1 based on its “explosive” spread throughout the Americas and the Caribbean. At the time, medical experts strongly suspected that the virus was implicated in microcephaly in more than 4,000 newborns in Brazil and feared that might be related to an uptick in another neurological condition, Guillain-Barre syndrome.
Since then, the evidence connecting Zika to microcephaly has mounted. Last week researchers in Slovenia confirmed microcephaly, brain injury and the Zika virus in the brain of a foetus whose mother had gotten pregnant while in Brazil. This week, researchers in Brazil said they found the virus in the brains of two infants with microcephaly who died just hours after birth.
Complicating the unfolding crisis is the assertion by a group of Argentine physicians that the rash of microcephaly cases is due to a larvicide, pyriproxyfen, used to control mosquitoes. Though there’s not a shred of scientific evidence that this is the case, the Brazilian government has stopped spraying, which may only worsen the Zika epidemic in that country.
Even before this new evidence came to light, the United Nation’s Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights called on Latin American countries to repeal their policies restricting reproductive rights and give women the help they need to avoid pregnancy if they wish. It fell on deaf ears.
Doctors and public health authorities have a duty to appeal to their countries’ leaders to give women access to birth control and abortion – at the very least until a Zika vaccine has been created or researchers rule out the virus as the cause of brain defects.
Left unsaid is that the inability of women to control their bodies in a most basic way has a direct impact on their economic situation – and that the Zika epidemic could make things even worse for them and their families.
LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*
The Chinese imprint
Hopes for Argentina IMF deal grow, but at what cost?
The US climate consensus
Endangered wild animals can pay for own protection
The supply-chain mess
Texas bears the brunt of US plastic pollution
Multilateralism’s secret sauce
Human vulnerability to the fore in the wake of Omicron
Europe’s two peace missions