|
A late-night decision from House Republicans to delay a vote to providebns of dollars in relief to states hardest hit by Superstorm Sandy has sparked a backlash among Democrats and some Northeast Republicans. If a vote isn’t held, the bill will have to be redrafted when a new Congress convenes, punting the weeks-old relief bill even further down the road. |
On the House floor, Representative Peter King, a Republican from storm-ravaged Long Island, N.Y., blasted the delay as “indefensible” and said Congress had a “moral obligation” to hold the vote. On Wednesday, he urged New Yorkers to withhold all donations to congressional Republicans in an appearance on Fox News, apparently so hopping mad about the delay that he doesn’t mind turning on his own party.
“I’m saying right now, anyone from New York or New Jersey who contributes one penny to congressional Republicans is out of their minds,” King said. He even hinted he might jump ship from the Republican Party altogether if they didn’t vote soon.
Democrats have been even harsher in their criticism. Senator Chuck Schumer of New York said in a press conference yesterday that he was “infuriated” by a comment from Representative Darrell Issa, a Republican from California, who said the bill didn’t move in the House because it was filled with pork. Schumer said Issa should speak to one of the hundreds of thousands of homeowners who need help repairing their homes and will now face a delay in getting relief.
“Tell that homeowner to his face ... that it’s pork,” Schumer said. He added that Issa would surely not want to face such a delay if an earthquake hit his home state: “I know he wouldn’t say the same thing about California.” Schumer added that he now hoped a bill would pass before the end of January, after the inauguration.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor had supported a version of the bill that split the aid package into two parts, but House Speaker John Boehner ended up deciding not to bring it up for a vote. “It’s a Boehner betrayal,” Schumer said.
A spokesman for Boehner, Michael Steel, said the speaker is committed to passing a bill this month. Boehner is meeting with the New York and New Jersey delegations this afternoon and has told them the relief bill is his top priority for the new Congress, a Boehner aide also said.
Some congressional Republicans have said the $60bn bill, which had already passed in the Senate, is too expensive, does not provide enough oversight for how the funds are spent—and that there is no real need to pass it quickly. The bill contains $11.5bn for the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s disaster relief fund, $17bn for community grants that help businesses and homeowners with rebuilding and repairs, and $9.7bn in government flood insurance.
An additional $11.7bn would go to fixing damaged mass transit systems and $5.3bn for the Army Corps of Engineers to prevent future flooding.
“FEMA has plenty of money, there’s no immediate needs,” House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers, R-Kentucky, told CNN on Tuesday.
“FEMA has enough money to last until at least late February-March.”
Schumer rejected the idea that the relief bill was not urgent, even though FEMA is adequately funded for now.
Yesterday he said flood insurance funds are set to run out next week, and that many homeowners are facing more than $100,000 in damage, making the $32,000 FEMA maximum grant inadequate. Some homeowners can’t sign repair contracts or get loans before they know the $17bn in homeowner relief will actually be provided by the government, Schumer added.
The October storm left more than 100 people dead and devastated parts of the Northeast, including New York City.
The backlash is also a reminder that feisty tri-state area politicians do not hold back their anger. Outspoken New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, for one, is scheduled to hold a press conference this afternoon.
And yesterday, New York Democratic Representative Steve Israel told CNN that “we rushed to aid Kabul and Baghdad when they had damage, but when it comes to aid to New York and New Jersey, the House Republican leadership decided we weren’t worth it”.