Turkiye and Saudi Arabia aim to build a railway to link the two countries with Jordan and Syria in the next three ‌or four years, Turkish Transport Minister Abdulkadir Uraloglu ​said Sunday, adding ‌other Gulf countries would also join the project.Speaking ‌to Al ⁠Jazeera, ‌Uraloglu said the railway would ‌help alleviate in future the problems that have arisen from ⁠the disruption of the Strait of Hormuz caused by the war in Iran. The project is described in a memorandum of understanding signed between Ankara and Riyadh last week on logistics cooperation and the railway sector.In the initial phase, a rail link would allow ​for the transport of goods, oil, natural gas and people between Saudi Arabia, Turkiye, Jordan, Syria and Europe, Uraloglu said, adding that the ‌Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, ⁠Oman, ​and possibly Yemen would be included later too."A ​train leaving from Saudi Arabia, from Riyadh already reaches several regions of Saudi Arabia. So this is a project for it to reach Turkiye via Jordan and Syria. We are talking about a route that will carry every type of freight via this route to Europe," Uraloglu was cited as saying. He said the route from Saudi Arabia to Jordan's ‌border had been finished and ‌on the Turkish side, ⁠the link was completed from Islahiye to Kilis and ⁠Gaziantep in southeastern ⁠Turkiye, near the border with Syria.That leaves a gap of some 400km between Syria and Jordan, he said.In addition to commercial trade, Uraloglu said the railway could also be used by people on the annual Haj pilgrimage.Turkiye, ​which neighbours Syria, has built close ties with the government in Damascus after the fall of President Bashar al-Assad at the end of 2024 and has said it will help the country rebuild.Uraloglu told Al Jazeera a financial plan would be drawn up for the rail project. The investment would include some $100mn to rebuild the route ‌between Turkiye ​and Syria's Aleppo, creating a direct link to Damascus.

One should leave the country within 14 days from the date of the residency permit cancellation, an official from the Ministry of Interior (MoI) stated on Monday. “Earlier it was 30 days, but currently it is two weeks,” said Captain Ali Ahmed Ali al-Kuwari from the MoI’s Airport Passport Department. “Those who stay after two weeks will have to pay a fine of QR10 per day.” He was addressing a webinar organised by the MoI’s Public Relations Department on the topic of “Safe Travels”, providing travel tips and the necessary procedures to follow before travelling out of Qatar. The official noted that people on a visit visa should verify the sticker affixed to their passport and follow the dates accordingly.“People who are on a visit visa to the country have to make sure of the duration of the stay in the country from the sticker fixed with the stamp in the passport,” Capt al-Kuwari said. “There is a fine of QR200 per day in case of overstay. This is a very important point as many people fail to notice the exact number of days allowed for the stay in the country.” He asked the public to check the Metrash app before they embark on any travel. “If you have any kind of traffic violations, overstay fine or any other dues, you can pay that electronically through Metrash and complete all the procedures before heading to the airport,” Capt al-Kuwari said. “In case you have any travel ban, you have to follow up with the concerned department to take out the travel ban to travel to your destination.” He also advised everyone to make use of the electronic gate (e-gate) facility to complete the immigration procedures, as it saves time and avoids long queues at the immigration counters. “The Airport Passports Department operates 76 electronic gates distributed through the passenger terminals at arrivals and departures,” Capt al-Kuwari said. “This is one of the vital services provided by the Airport Passports Department free of charge to all citizens, residents, and visitors. The objective of this service is to save time and effort and avoid waiting in front of the immigration counters inside the airport.” “It takes just about 10-15 seconds to complete the formalities through the e-gates,” he added. “When you are going to the passport counters or e-gates, follow the floor markings that regulate the entry process of travelers,” the official continued. “There are markings on the floor for the proper standing on the area. If you are following those markings, then the process will be finished easily and quickly.” Capt al-Kuwari noted that people can use the Metrash app if they need to transfer the residency permit to a new passport.For a newborn baby, the resident must visit the passport office to report the birth and obtain the newborn’s visa through the approved procedures. “A newborn in the country should obtain a residence permit on the sponsorship of the father after obtaining necessary document from the person’s embassy,” the official said. “In case a residence permit is not obtained, the newborn cannot re-enter Qatar.”

Authored by Faisal Al-Mudahka, a Qatari Arab citizen who believes in universal peace, this open letter is addressed to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, nominating His Highness Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, Amir of the State of Qatar, for the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of his diplomatic leadership and his role in supporting mediation efforts that contributed to the de-escalation of the Iran–United States conflict and the promotion of global peace and stability. The following is the open letter addressed to the Norwegian Nobel Committee. Mr. Jørgen Watne FrydnesChair, Norwegian Nobel CommitteeDistinguished Members of the Committee, Oslo, Norway Dear Mr. Frydnes and Members of the Committee,I write to you as a Qatari Arab citizen who holds in common with the peoples of the world an abiding belief in justice, in the equal dignity of every human life, and in peace not as a regional aspiration but as a universal obligation. It is in that spirit, and with the full weight of conscience, that I nominate His Highness Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, Amir of the State of Qatar, for the Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of his significant diplomatic role in supporting efforts that contributed to the de-escalation and eventual resolution of the Iran-United States conflict. For one hundred and six days, from the twenty-eighth of February to the fourteenth of June 2026, the region burned. The Gulf, which supplies nearly a quarter of the world's energy, found itself at the very center of that fire, and with it Qatar, the largest exporter of liquefied natural gas on earth. The consequences were not contained by geography. They radiated outward with the speed of markets and the quiet cruelty of economics, falling hardest on the poor and the middle classes in the farthest corners of the world, people who had no hand in this conflict and no voice in its resolution, yet who felt it in the price of bread and fuel, in the factory that closed, in the small business that could not survive. Across Asia, Europe, the Americas, and beyond, the cost of living rose, livelihoods were lost, and futures were quietly extinguished. Let us pause to contemplate the full scale of what was averted. The loss of a quarter of the world's energy supply, combined with the closure of the Strait of Hormuz through which one fifth of global oil trade passes, would not merely have driven prices upward. It would have fractured global supply chains, halted industrial production across continents, created shortages of medicine and food, and unleashed waves of poverty in nations that bore no responsibility for the conflict. The Gulf region, one of the most remarkable stories of economic development in modern history and among the last remaining sources of hope in a part of the world long ravaged by war, stood at the edge of an abyss. What Sheikh Tamim helped pull back from that edge was not the fate of one region. It was the stability of the world. Qatar did not watch from a distance. Iranian missiles struck Qatari sovereign territory and civilian areas. The Ras Laffan facility, the beating heart of Qatar's liquefied natural gas infrastructure and a vital artery of energy for homes and industries across the globe, sustained serious damage. The economic toll was severe and sustained. Any statesman could have been forgiven for turning inward, for declaring that his country had endured enough. Sheikh Tamim did not. He transformed his nation's wounds into resolve, its losses into purpose, and refused to allow Qatar's suffering to become an alibi for disengagement. What unfolded was a diplomacy of rare patience and uncommon courage. While Pakistan held the formal mantle of mediation between Washington and Tehran, Qatar worked with tireless discretion behind the scenes, serving simultaneously as a trusted channel to both capitals. Most remarkable of all, Qatar's specialized negotiating team made multiple journeys to Tehran, entering a city still living beneath the shadow of active warfare, carrying no weapons and seeking no advantage, only the tools of dialogue and the discipline of experienced negotiators who understood how to narrow the distance between positions that seemed irreconcilable. Under the direct guidance of Sheikh Tamim himself, they met with senior Iranian officials, absorbed the full complexity of each side's grievances, and worked with extraordinary skill to bridge the remaining gaps until the path to agreement finally opened on the night of June 14, 2026. In parallel, Sheikh Tamim engaged President Donald Trump in a sustained and consequential series of direct exchanges. At the most perilous moment of the conflict, when a further major military strike appeared imminent, Trump publicly acknowledged that the Amir of Qatar had personally asked him to hold back, and that he had done so. In that single act, a great power paused at the request of a small state's leader, and the world moved a step further from catastrophe. No diplomatic communiqué captures that moment more eloquently than the fact itself. The depth of this diplomacy lies in its foundations. Qatar does not pursue peace as a tactical instrument. It believes in it as a civilizational necessity. Qatar holds a principled conviction in coexistence with Iran as a neighboring state sharing the same waters, and understands that the path to development and regional stability runs through open engagement, not through walls of hostility, however deep the disagreements that divide them. This is not pragmatism alone. It is a moral position rooted in the recognition that neighbors are not chosen and that peace with them is not optional but obligatory. This commitment to peace did not begin in 2026. Before this war erupted, Sheikh Tamim had spent more than fifteen months in painstaking mediation over Gaza, working alongside Egypt and the United States to bring about the ceasefire agreement that halted the fighting and secured the release of hostages and Palestinian prisoners. He did not rest there. He continued to call for a permanent and just peace between Palestinians and Israelis, for an end to the military occupation, and for the Palestinian people's right to a sovereign state with Jerusalem as its capital, grounding every position in the authority of international law, United Nations resolutions, and the Arab Peace Initiative. For Sheikh Tamim, the peace of the region is indivisible, and no settlement in one theater can be complete while injustice endures in another. Throughout every stage of these crises, Sheikh Tamim upheld with consistency and conviction the principles of international law and the prerogatives of multilateral institutions. Qatar brought its concerns before the United Nations and the Security Council at each critical juncture, insisting always that no solution imposed by force could prove durable, and that only agreements anchored in international legitimacy could hold. In doing so, he demonstrated that small nations can shape history not through the force of arms but through the force of principle. What has distinguished Qatar's diplomacy across all of these crises is its constancy. While negotiating rounds collapsed, while ceasefires broke, while the architecture of diplomacy seemed at times to be disintegrating entirely, Doha never ceased its effort. Sheikh Tamim held to a single conviction through it all: that the negotiating table is the only legitimate arena for the resolution of conflict. History has vindicated that conviction repeatedly and finally. The Nobel Peace Prize has, at its most luminous moments, recognized not merely the cessation of hostilities but the moral vision required to pursue peace when the easier path is war. Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani pursued that harder path while missiles fell on his own country, while markets reeled and ordinary lives were upended across the globe, and while an entire region held its breath and prayed that someone, somewhere, still believed that words could accomplish what weapons could not. He believed it. He acted on it. And on the night of June 14, 2026, the guns fell silent. To honor him is to honor every human being, in every nation, who shares the conviction that peace is not the privilege of the powerful but the birthright of all. It is to honor the hope that refuses to die in a part of the world that has known too much suffering for too long. With the deepest respect and sincerity,Faisal Al-MudahkaA Qatari Arab Citizen Who Believes in Universal PeaceDoha, State of QatarJune 15, 2026 Ultimately, this letter stands as a call to recognize the quiet but decisive force of diplomacy at moments when the world stood closest to escalation. It reflects a conviction that leadership is most meaningfully measured not in times of ease, but in times of crisis—when choices shape the fate of nations and the stability of the global order. In that context, the nomination of His Highness Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani is presented as an appeal to acknowledge the enduring impact of dialogue over conflict, and the possibility of peace even in the most fractured of times.