Speaking before a darkened ballroom, US Chamber of Commerce CEO Suzanne Clark called on executives to be “fearless” in defence of free markets over government control and said the US must remain “open to the world, open to the global exchange of talent and ‌goods and ideas and innovation.”

The comments by the head of the most powerful US business lobby group could be seen as mild ‌pushback against President Donald Trump, who has waded into ‍business mechanics like no other US president. He has directed the US to take stakes in tech companies, asserted control of corporate equity structures, imposed tariffs, and advanced immigration policies opposed by the chamber.

This month, several CEOs, including Exxon Mobil’s Darren Woods and JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon, also have offered temperate critiques of certain Trump agenda items. But they limited their remarks to sectors where they have interests - Venezuela’s oil and ‍the US Federal Reserve, while Clark did not mention Trump by name or his policies during the speech.

Even as masked immigration agents confront US citizens in Minneapolis and Trump considers seizing Greenland, which may cut off American businesses from European markets, the response from business leaders has been milquetoast, said Richard Painter, University of Minnesota law professor and chief ethics lawyer for former President George ‌W Bush.

“I’d like to see a lot more aggressive stance from the Chamber here,” Painter said of Clark’s speech. “A lot of executives may have voted for Trump, but they need to speak out against coercion, whether it’s aimed at a protester in ‍the streets or aimed at a CEO who isn’t doing what the president wants them ‌to.”

Mark Levine, a Democrat who is the new New York City Comptroller overseeing public pension funds with stakes in the largest US companies, said CEOs have taken only “baby steps,” speaking up only when Trump’s actions directly affect their businesses. Asked for comment, a Chamber spokesman noted a briefing that Clark held for reporters in which she said that “We are against government intervention in business, no matter which party is suggesting it.” She added that CEOs have been doing “quiet work” to promote sound public policies behind the scenes, and “not rushing to outrage.”

In August, Neil Bradley, the chamber’s chief policy officer, told Reuters the group aimed to respond to Trump in a nonpartisan way, to preserve support for free markets. Trump’s approval rating on the economy currently stands at a lacklustre 36%, below his overall 41% rating even as he portrays his economic policies as succeeding by conventional measures.

“Under our administration, growth is exploding, productivity is soaring, investment is booming, incomes are rising, ​inflation is defeated, America is respected again like never before,” Trump ‌said in Detroit on Tuesday. A few prominent CEOs have openly questioned some of his actions.

On January 13, JPMorgan’s Dimon said he supported the independence of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, days after the administration opened a criminal investigation into Powell’s conduct. Dimon added that Trump’s meddling in the Fed could spike inflation. “I don’t care what he says,” Trump told Reuters about Dimon’s comments. A JPMorgan representative declined to comment for this article.

A day earlier, Albert ​Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, said he was annoyed by Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr’s move to roll back vaccine recommendations for children. “I’m seriously frustrated, because what is happening has zero scientific merit,” he told journalists in San Francisco. Pfizer representatives did not respond to questions.

The Conference Board released a survey showing that for US CEOs, the biggest risk factor in 2026 is uncertainty. Dana Peterson, chief economist at the Conference Board, said the survey did not specifically ask about Trump, but that “the executives I’ve spoken with understand that lobbying is different now.”

Gary Clyde Hufbauer, senior fellow of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said CEOs may be calibrating their comments to avoid blowback and to position their companies to benefit from Trump’s policies or interests.

But unless companies push back, this could open the door to heavier regulation after Trump leaves office, Hufbauer said. “My guess is they (CEOs) think the actions are a passing fad,” Hufbauer said. “Since state capitalism is catnip both to progressive Democrats and to some MAGA Republicans, executives and investors could be asleep at the switch,” he said. – Reuters