By Pam Louwagie
The criticism came swiftly last week after Atlantic magazine published a writer’s account saying that Senator Al Franken “groped” her in 2009 by putting his hand on her waist during a photo op, “grabbing a handful of flesh” and squeezing at least twice.
“I’m sorry, is that sexual assault now? To squeeze someone’s waist?” one Twitter user wrote.
“And this is your definition of a grope? Come on! This accusation trivialises real predation and abuse. Knock it off!” a woman echoed on Facebook.
“We are officially #offtherails,” another posted.
It was the type of backlash some feared. As a reckoning over sexual harassment sweeps the US, leaders in business, academia and other walks of life are pushing to sustain the momentum and ensure a positive, lasting cultural change without it getting derailed by politics, social media frenzies and outsize responses to infractions many deem small.
“There’s just too much putting everything into one big bucket instead of looking at the nuance,” said Fran Sepler, a Minneapolis human resources consultant who has helped develop training for the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
As allegations spreads from Hollywood figures to powerful lawmakers in recent months, what started as a “really extraordinary conversation” about the need for industries to examine their cultures and people feeling emboldened to speak out is, in some instances, getting politicised and weaponised, Sepler said. As a result, she said, it’s turned the discussion into “something a little more complicated and a little more nasty and I think a little less productive.”
Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg cautioned that she’d heard “the rumblings of a backlash,” including men becoming afraid to hire women.
Conservative columnist Christine Flowers, in Philadelphia, called the #MeToo movement denouncing sexual assault and harassment “unwieldy and unforgiving, mixing all sorts of conduct together and retroactively stigmatising acts that — until the social media age — were considered boorish and brutish but not capital offences.”
Those who have spent part of their careers working to end sexual harassment are finding that the digital age has catapulted society into uncharted territory on the issue, bringing new voice to the debate while also posing a danger of distracting from it.
To change the culture, they say, people need a sense that fair process will prevail and responses will be commensurate to the behaviour. Society needs to stay focused on the ubiquitous confirmed cases of sexual harassment and assault, they say.
“We lose the opportunity for education if everything is (seen as) a criminal offence,” said Hamline University business professor Peggy Andrews, a longtime human resources and management consultant. “On the other hand, we’ve allowed criminal offences to go unpunished for so long.”
The recent wave of attention and awareness is widely seen as a long-overdue milestone, empowering victims to speak up while toppling perpetrators. It flooded social media when victims of sexual harassment and assault started typing #MeToo on their accounts after allegations were lodged against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.
While distinctions need to be made between the severity of allegations, it all is part of a continuum that “has to do with a sense of entitlement” by the perpetrators, said political science professor Jill Locke, who directs the Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies Program at Gustavus Adolphus College. People have to be careful about sending a message that victims can’t come forward unless certain criteria are met, she said.
If someone comes forward alleging something that people on social media don’t think is a big deal, she said, then people should instead “focus on the plethora of cases that are a big deal and do something about those.”
Sepler, who has spent 30 years investigating harassment claims as part of her work, said that she thinks that “99.9 percent of the people who come forward claiming they’ve been sexually harassed believe they’ve been sexually harassed. … Whether the behaviour they’re complaining about rises to the very high bar of unlawful harassment, and whether they feel sexually harassed are two different questions.”
A one-time, awkward hug, for example, won’t typically get someone fired, human resources professionals said, though it might result in a conversation. So, getting caught up in too much debate about “gray areas” of social interaction isn’t productive, they say.
“Personally, I don’t see that it’s any more gray now than it’s ever been,” said Susan Strauss, a trainer, consultant and harassment and bullying investigator based in Burnsville, Minnesota. Even workplace flirting and dating will not end, she and some others predicted, nor should companies expect it to.
“You just use common sense,” she said. “If you ask somebody out and they say ‘No’ … then you say, ‘You know what, I’m sorry. I didn’t intend for that to be offensive and won’t do it again.’?”
Lasting change will require specific cultural shifts, Finnegan and others say.
Male and female bystanders can help define what is considered acceptable by letting offenders know when a mildly lewd joke isn’t appropriate or when they see unwelcome interactions taking place.
“That helps people who are likely to harass or do other things, they will see that and they will recognise ‘Oh, the norm here is different,’?” Finnegan said. Hollywood can play a role, too, by putting story lines about harassment into movies and television, Finnegan said.
Fewer nondisclosure agreements in legal settlements will also help to show victims that action has been taken in cases, and will “stop allowing people to hide behind their settlement agreements,” said Minneapolis employment attorney Stacey DeKalb.
Most critical for companies, schools and other institutions is for leaders to set a respectful tone, women’s advocates agree. Highlighting examples of positive behaviour is more effective than focusing on what people should not do.
In the end, though, many say, much of the change will come down to finding ways for people to have potentially uncomfortable conversations with others.
“We’re human and we’re awkward; we need more pathways to have awkward conversations without fear of legal reprisals,” said Andrews, the Hamline professor.
Although the law says victims never have to directly confront someone who is harassing them, that doesn’t mean victims shouldn’t, Sepler said. While that might be the best way to address harassment from a manager, the more common peer-to-peer harassment can often be handled face to face and on the spot.
“I think there’s a powerful place for women to take on their own agency in those situations where they’re not afraid of reprisal and speak up for themselves or speak up for others,” said Sepler, who teaches people how to do it.
At company trainings, Sepler presents a scenario where someone is unknowingly annoying a co-worker — tapping their toes or looking at them in a way that makes them feel gross.
“Would you rather that they tell you? Or would you rather that they report you to human resources?” Sepler asks. “One hundred percent of people say, ‘I would rather they tell me.’?” Addressing it with them can be a gift if it’s presented in the right spirit, she said. That may include telling the person that they are appreciated and that you don’t want to see their success derailed.
“We’re learning that if you actually tell them what they’re doing is bugging you, there’s a good chance that they’ll stop,” she said, “and that they won’t retaliate against you, if you do it in a way that’s you know, ‘Hey, you know, I really like you, but I’m not a hugger.’?” —Star Tribune (Minneapolis)/TNS
LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*
Harassed by pixels
Top GU-Q students honoured for academic excellence
Iranian investors explore opportunities in Nepal
Nepali organisation holds seminar on youth
The ace up space
Sri Lankan community celebrates Sinhala, Tamil New Year 2018
New CIRS research book explores intricacies of digital Middle East
Theme for a dream