The problem with issuing a dire ultimatum as a first response to a traditionally bellicose regime is that the one issuing it is boxed in. That could well be the problem that President Donald Trump could likely face as he deals with North Korea’s supreme leader Kim Jong-un’s increasingly aggressive moves threatening the US.
In a statement that is said to have taken the national security establishment by surprise, the US president said: “North Korea best not make any more threats to the US. They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.” This came in the aftermath of unconfirmed reports that Pyongyang has produced miniaturised nuclear warheads that can be mounted on a missile.
Coupled with the fact that it now has long-range intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) capable of reaching the US, the latest unconfirmed intelligence is certainly worrisome. However, through the retaliatory threat of unleashing “fire and fury like the world has never seen”, thereby clearly implying a nuclear strike, Trump’s statement may turn out to be one too soon.
Rather than feeling chastised, North Korea seems to feel emboldened as its state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) issued several statements, including the one that said the government was “carefully examining” plans to launch missiles at the US-controlled island of Guam in the Pacific Ocean.
A day after the US president’s “fire and fury” threat, Pyongyang upped the ante, calling it a “load of nonsense” on August 9. It went a step further by issuing an even more specific threat to fire four missiles that it said would land within 40km of Guam as a sort of a shot across the bow.
That Pyongyang intensified its original threat barely 24 hours later in the face of the unprecedented warning from the US president speaks of the imprudence of his response. It is the kind of ultimatum that has to be backed with action without which Washington will have no next step as Pyongyang continues to ratchet up its aggression. Kim Jong-un considers nuclear weapons as his only guarantee of survival in the face of mounting international pressure on him. He is not going to give those up, no matter what the international community might say or do.
At a personal level, the idea that he is able to provoke a strong response from the US president senior to him by nearly four decades is bound to give Kim a considerable thrill. Traditionally, the North Korean leadership has thrived on such sabre-rattling and now that the sabre has a nuclear edge, it is expected to make diplomatic intercourse with him that much harder.
The US president’s statement is in direct conflict with his own Secretary of State Rex Tillerson just a few days ago. “We do not seek a regime change,” Tillerson said on August 1 before he set off on a visit to the Philippines, Malaysia and Thailand. “We do not seek the collapse of the regime, we do not seek an accelerated reunification of the peninsula, we do not seek an excuse to send our military north of the 38th parallel,” he said.
A little over a week later the situation has taken a 180-degree turn with reports of Pyongyang being able to miniaturise nuclear warheads, stringent UN sanctions against North Korea, Trump’s extraordinary statement and Pyongyang’s threat against Guam.
It is hard to make concession in the name of Trump’s characteristic penchant for hyperbole and bluster because he is dealing with a leader who has lived outside international norms in the tradition of his father Kim Jong-il and grandfather Kim Il-sung. Unless the US president thinks that he can conduct his country’s foreign policy with a measure of matching cavalier style, his threat might turn out to be a case of premature articulation.
LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*
How UK could change its mind about Brexit
Winter Olympics can help push for Korean peace
Quitting smoking can add years, quality of life
‘Dementia towns’ in ageing Japan
New debt crisis looms for developing world
Mediterranean-style diet may lower risk of prostate cancer
Polls key to bridging LatAm’s social divide
Clearing up nutrition questions