Tony Blair has denied that a Labour government paid compensation to the former Guantanamo Bay detainee who went on to blow himself up in Iraq, in a strongly worded statement in which he accused the Daily Mail of hypocritical coverage over the Manchester-born rebel’s death.
The former prime minister said that compensation — thought to amount to £1m — was paid out under the Conservative-led coalition government in 2010 — and criticised the tabloid for blaming him and Labour instead.
“He was not paid compensation by my government,” Blair said.” The compensation was agreed in 2010 by the Conservative government.”
The Daily Mail front-page story was the death of Jamal al-Harith — who changed his name from Ronald Fiddler after converting to Islam in his 20s but most recently went by the nom de guerre Abu-Zakariya al-Britani — in which Blair’s government was singled out for “intense lobbying” for his release.
Blair hit out at the Daily Mail’s “utter hypocrisy”, pointing out that the newspaper led a media campaign for Harith’s release from Guantanamo Bay.
“It is correct that Jamal al-Harith was released from Guantanamo Bay at the request of the British government in 2004,” he said.”This followed a massive media and parliamentary campaign, led by the Daily Mail, the very paper that is now supposedly so outraged at his release, and strongly supported by the then Conservative opposition.”
The former prime minister singled out a headline entitled “Still think he wasn’t a danger, Mr Blair? Fury at Labour government’s £1mn compensation for innocent Brit.”
“The Mail headline shortly after he was released after months of their campaigning was Freedom at last for Guantanamo Britons’. They then quoted with approval various human rights activists saying, ‘Clearly by what’s happened they’re not bad guys, they are entirely innocent’.”
Harith, 50, is said by Islamic State to have carried out the suicide attack on coalition forces near Mosul on Monday.
A British former Guantanamo Bay detainee, Manchester-born Harith was paid the £1mn in compensation by the UK government after his release in 2004 from the US-operated military prison. In 2014, 10 years after he returned to the UK, he left for Syria to join Isis.
Fiddler was reportedly awarded compensation after claiming that British agents knew he was being mistreated at Guantanamo.
Blair, who was PM from 1997 to 2007, said: “The fact is that this was always a very difficult situation where any government would have to balance proper concern for civil liberties with desire to protect our security, and we were likely to be attacked whatever course we took. The reason it did take a long time for their release was precisely the anxiety over their true affiliations.”
He added: “Those who demanded their release should not be allowed to get away with now telling us that it is a scandal that it happened.”
Former Labour home secretary Jack Straw said it was not only the left and civil liberties groups that were calling for the release of detainees from Guantanamo Bay in the early 2000s, the Daily Mail and others on the right were very outspoken too.
“At the time the Daily Mail was demanding their release. It is very convenient for journalists and commentators and for the public to flip on this...[but] we had to make best decision at the time which I think we did.”
But Straw said that although it was a Tory government who agreed the compensation deal in 2010, he accepted a Labour government may have taken the same decision.” The difficulty at that time was that there was no mechanism by which the evidence against these people who were suing the British government for complicity could be taken into court without the risk of us disclosing really sensitive intelligence which could, in turn, literally have led to the death of British agents.”
Harith was taken to Guantanamo Bay after being found in a prison in Afghanistan early in 2002, where he had been placed after being intercepted by the Taliban, who believed him to be a British spy.
According to his sister, Maxine Fiddler, he initially believed the Americans to be his “saviours”. However, they imprisoned him after coming to the conclusion that he had tried to join the Islamic fundamentalist group.
He was finally released in 2004 after lobbying by the then home secretary David Blunkett, who said that none of the people whose release from Guantanamo he had secured “will actually be a threat to the security of the British people”. Lord Carlile, the former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, told the Today programme he believed Harith was paid off to avoid disclosing sensitive national security material in court.
“It should have never been paid on the merits,” he said. “There was absolutely no merit in paying him a penny because plainly he was a terrorist and he was a potentially dangerous terrorist.
Hariths Guantanamo file shows he was taken to the camp because he was “expected to have knowledge of Taliban treatment of prisoners and interrogation tactics”. His release was recommended by Guantanamo’s commandant in 2002 “on the assessment that the detainee was not affiliated with Al Qaeda or a Taliban leader”. But he was kept in captivity because it was decided he had been involved in a terrorist attack against the US, despite the fact he had not been questioned about such an attack.
Harith’s wife told Channel 4 News the following year that she had pursued him to Syria with her children in a failed attempt to persuade him to come home.
Raffaello Pantucci, director of international security studies at Rusi, said: “This is a guy who first converted in the early 90s, gets on a radical path in the late 90s, gets caught up in Gitmo [Guantanamo], comes out of Gitmo, and it’s not clear what he did after that.
“Then almost 20 years later the he decides to take the ultimate choice. That’s intriguing to me. It shows how these ideas never leave you. It’s a very deep-set ideology.”
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office said: “The UK has advised for some time against all travel to Syria, and against all travel to large parts of Iraq. As all UK consular services are suspended in Syria and greatly limited in Iraq, it is extremely difficult to confirm the whereabouts and status of British nationals in these areas.”
A spokeswoman for Greater Manchester police said: “In line with national policy we don’t comment on people who are believed to have travelled to Syria.”
