Big banks park energy sector bonds in US money funds
January 09 2015 09:44 PM
RELATED STORIES
Pedestrians walk past the corporate headquarters of Barclays in London. Barclays Bank,  Credit Suiss
Pedestrians walk past the corporate headquarters of Barclays in London. Barclays Bank, Credit Suisse and Wells Fargo and others get overnight and sho

Reuters/Boston


Big European and American banks have found a productive place to park the energy sector’s

most distressed debt: the $2.7tn US money market industry.
Barclays Bank, Credit Suisse and Wells Fargo and others get overnight and short-term loans

from companies that run money market mutual funds such as Fidelity Investments, BlackRock,

American Beacon and others. The banks use the money to fund long positions in securities

or to cover short positions. For collateral, the funds are accepting the junk-rated bonds

of beat-up energy companies.
Even though the value of the bonds are in free fall as oil prices plummet, the money funds

readily accept the debt, because it’s a way to generate above-market yields in an industry

hurt by near-zero interest rates. In 2014, the average yield for taxable money fund

investors was a paltry 0.01%. Banks currently have about $90bn outstanding in short-term

and overnight loans backed by riskier assets that include corporate debt and equities.
The exact amount of junk-rated energy debt used as collateral was not available. But more

than a dozen of the sector’s mostly highly distressed issuers, including QuickSilver

Resources, Black Elk Energy, Halcon Resources, Samson Investment and Sidewinder Drilling

Inc, have had their bonds used as collateral, according to recent fund disclosures.
These so-called “other repurchase agreements” generate above-market yields for the funds,

ranging anywhere from 20 basis points to 50 basis points. In contrast, repo loans backed

by safe US Treasuries can generate yields of about 10 basis points and less, according to

recent fund disclosures.
Most money fund assets are in Treasuries, certificates of deposit and government agency

debt. But some jarring discoveries in the types of collateral money funds accept on

short-term loans to big banks can be found by investors who dig through industry

disclosures.
A money fund run by Morgan Stanley recently disclosed, for example, an $8.25mn repurchase

agreement with Credit Suisse, which used bonds issued by Sidewinder Drilling as most of

the collateral. As oil prices have tumbled, so has the value of Sidewinder’s 2019 bonds,

falling about 44% since early October.
Credit Suisse declined to comment.
Money funds downplay the risk in the repo transactions backed by the junk-rated

collateral. They say their ultimate backstop is the bank on the other side of the deal.

Fidelity, the largest money fund operator in the industry, declined to comment on any

specific transaction. In a statement, the company said, “We make an independent assessment

on the counter-party credit quality in all repurchase agreements to ensure the counter-

party represents minimal credit risk.”
By contrast, No 1 US mutual fund company Vanguard Group plays it safe. The $133bn Vanguard

Prime Money Market Fund and the company’s other money funds only accept US government

securities as collateral, company spokesman David Hoffman said.
“In times of stress, governments are far more liquid than other asset classes,” Hoffman

said. “This is especially true with US Treasuries, which are likely to rally during times

of stress.”
Federal Reserve Bank policymakers say they are worried that some banks rely too much on

repo loans as a source of wholesale funding. They also point out how money funds make

loans secured by assets they would quickly unload if the bank on the other side of the

deal defaulted.
“What always worries you about wholesale funding is the run risk,” John Williams,

president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, told reporters this week at an

economic conference in Boston. “... Heavy reliance on wholesale funding, which is still

there for certain institutions, is an important issue that we need to address and make

sure our financial system is resilient to things going wrong.”
Despite a host of new regulations for money funds and banks, some of the same elements of

risk that led to a redemption run in the money fund industry and the failure of Lehman

Brothers in 2008 remain intact. Treasury and Federal Reserve officials say more work needs

to be done to address the risks of asset fire sales and redemption runs.
A redemption run on the Reserve Primary Fund in 2008 has been a rallying cry for reform

after its exposure to Lehman Brothers debt prompted panicked investors to withdraw their

money in droves. That run led the fund to “break the buck,” a rare event in the money

market fund industry that refers to a fund’s net asset value falling below $1 per share.
In recent presentations, Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren has said there should be more

disclosure about the composition of the collateral used in repo agreements. He said it

would allow investors an opportunity to observe changes in financing patterns and might

prevent risk taking that investors may consider excessive.
And this summer, before oil prices began their descent, bonds issued by Black Elk Energy

Offshore Operations were used as collateral in repo agreements with funds run by Fidelity,

BlackRock Inc and Goldman Sachs’ investment management arm, fund disclosures show.
But in recent months, Black Elk debt maturing later this year is not turning up as

collateral in the latest round of money fund disclosures. The yield on its bonds has

spiked as high as 75% in the past month, an indication of the bond market’s dimming view

the company can avoid default.



Last updated:


There are no comments.

LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*
MORE NEWS