|
Hamas’s former Gaza prime minister Ismail Haniya said yesterday the group would not hold any direct talks with Israel. |
There would be “no direct negotiations with the Zionist enemy”, Haniya said in a public address in the Gaza Strip, and called on Western-backed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to “review” his own strategy of talks with Israel.
Hamas does not recognise Israel which denounces Hamas as a “terrorist” organisation, and the two sides have never had any overt direct contact.
But on Thursday, exiled Hamas official Mussa Abu Marzuq—along with Haniya one of the movement’s two deputy leaders—said direct talks with the Jewish state might be unavoidable in light of planned negotiations in Cairo to consolidate last month’s tentative Gaza truce.
“If the situation remains as it is now... Hamas could find itself forced to do this,” Abu Marzuq said, referring to the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza after 50 days of Israeli pounding from air, land and sea, which ended on August 26.
“From a legal (Islamic) perspective there is nothing wrong with negotiating with the occupation,” he said, indicating it could be necessary in order to guarantee the “rights” of the people of Gaza.
Truce talks are due to resume in Egypt later this month, but Hamas chief Khalid Mishal has himself ruled out face-to-face dealings with the Israelis.
“Direct negotiations with the Israeli occupier are not on the agenda of Hamas; if negotiations are necessary they must be indirect,” he said on Friday after meeting Tunisian President Moncef Marzouki in Tunis.
Mishal has also rejected Israeli demands that Gaza reconstruction be linked to the disarmament of Hamas and Haniya restated that line yesterday.
“The weapons of the resistance are a red line,” he said. “You cannot make (them) bargaining chips for reconstruction.”
