Agencies/New Delhi
Booker prize-winning author Arundhati Roy launched a scathing attack yesterday on the “aggressive nationalism” behind the anti-corruption drive led by hunger-striking campaigner Anna Hazare. In a column entitled “I’d rather not be Anna” published in The Hindu newspaper, the novelist, essayist and rights activist condemned both the style and substance of Hazare’s campaign that has mobilised public opinion in India. In particular she questioned Hazare’s use of the hunger strike and other tactics and symbols co-opted from his hero Mahatma Gandhi. “While his means may be Gandhian, Anna Hazare’s demands are certainly not,” Roy said. The focus of Hazare’s protest is a new anti-corruption bill. The 74-year-old activist says the current draft is too weak and wants parliament to pass his own version which gives more scope and power to an ombudsman who would monitor politicians, bureaucrats and the judiciary. While agreeing that the government bill was so flawed “that it was impossible to take seriously,” Roy said Gandhi would have been dismayed by Hazare’s vision of an all-powerful, centralised ombudsman.“It will function as an independent administration, meant to counter the bloated, unaccountable, corrupt one that we already have. Two oligarchies instead of one,” Roy said. Hazare has drawn huge crowds to the open air venue where he is staging his hunger strike in central Delhi. The atmosphere is one of celebratory protest, with the crowds singing along to patriotic songs and waving the Indian national flag. But Roy, a vocal government critic, said she was dismayed by “the props and the choreography, the aggressive nationalism” of the Hazare movement. “They signal to us that if we do not support the fast, we are not ‘true Indians’,” she said. “Who is he really, this new saint, this Voice of the People?” she asked, accusing Hazare of remaining silent on other issues like farmers’ suicides in his home state of Maharashtra. Former Lok Sabha speaker Somnath Chatterjee too criticised Hazare saying his campaign is undemocratic.“If the government goes out for the so called people’s movement, then what will happen? There will be election and it will be on the opposition to form the government... have they promised to pass the Jan Lokpal bill and can they do it,” Chatterjee asked.In an interview to CNN IBN, Chatterjee said the demands put forth by Anna and his supporters were “anti-democratic”.“To my mind, from what I have seen, the prime minister is an honest man. The talks...that he should control corruption...it’s not a democratic demand. It sounds rather anti-democratic to me,” he said.“How can you fix a time limit...on what authority are they fixing a time limit,” he asked, referring to the demand of civil society activists to pass the anti-graft legislation by August 30.