At the beginning of the year, it appeared that while US assets, especially stocks, were over-valued according to traditional metrics, there were no obvious or compelling alternatives. There needed to be a trigger, or triggers, to prompt significant diversion of investments towards other markets. Now, the triggers exist: The tariff policy and related concerns over US financial governance. These have erupted since President Donald Trump’s ‘liberation day’ on April 2 that pledged very high tariffs on numerous nations. Some of these have been paused, but overall the policy remains protectionist – and unpredictable. In the second week of April, the phrase ‘EM-ification’ entered the vocabulary of financial traders to describe the US economy, according to the Financial Times. The ‘EM’ stands for ‘emerging market’. The US, with its volatile policy-making, high debt, personality cult surrounding its political leader, has started to exhibit features that traditionally were associated with an under-developed economy with weak institutions, prone to capture by a charismatic leader.Investing in US bonds or stocks is no longer a neutral, safe option. So while it is not unprecedented for the US dollar to show weakness – what is new is that it has fallen when riskier asset prices have also fallen. It is losing its safe haven status. This is a situation that almost no one in the financial markets was expecting as recently as two months ago. The dollar remains by far the most important trading and reserve currency, but some of the features that have sustained this are going into reverse.Europe has a historic opportunity. The reasons for switching investments from the US to Europe are not only negative ones. In March, the leaders of the likely next coalition government in Germany announced an end to the debt brake as they abandoned the fiscal strictness of the post-Second World War years. The move was approved by Parliament. This was largely a response to the need to fund rearmament programmes, given the pivot away from European security by the Trump administration, and the continuing conflict in Ukraine and perceived threat from Russia’s President Putin. But there is likely to be an economic dividend also, with Europe’s biggest economy set for fiscal and wider economic expansion. Prospects for economic growth in Europe have improved significantly. In response to the trade war, China has stopped buying Boeing aircraft, which represents an opportunity for its own aviation industry and for Europe’s Airbus.Just over a decade ago the euro hit a major crisis. It had permitted some economies, notably Greece, to become part of the single currency despite insufficient economic convergence and weak controls over borrowing. The austerity programs that followed the crisis were severe, but the problems have been largely overcome. The GDP of the EU is comparable to that of China. In addition to a functioning currency, it has democratic institutions and global companies, notably in pharmaceuticals, banking and aerospace and car manufacture. Growth has been slow but Germany’s fiscal stimulus will likely be impactful.A commonly observed weakness of the EU is that, as a constellation of nations, decision-making can be opaque and slow. Yet this perceived weakness may be a hidden strength: it is slower to make good decisions, but also to make poor ones. The US has the opposite problem. So even if a populist leader were to take control of Germany or France, there would be countervailing forces and the EU could potentially remain a safe haven in financial terms.Turkey, at the juncture of Europe and Asia, is also well positioned for growth and development. It has a growing manufacturing base, a young population and is relatively neutral in geopolitical terms.The US could be losing precious human capital, as well as financial capital. The new President’s attacks on the independence of US universities and federal cuts to research funding, have had a major impact.For years the US has led the world in research excellence, and in attracting the finest minds from all over the world, some of whom have become hi-tech business leaders. This could be going into reverse. A staggering 75% of researchers in US universities were considering relocating to other countries, according to a poll in the scientific journal Nature in March. The desire to leave was particularly strong among researchers who were early in their careers, where the proportion was nearly 80%. Some 1,600 researchers were polled in total.In addition, the hostility of the Trump regime towards undocumented migrants creates a sense of fear. There have also been reports in several news media of law-abiding tourists being detained by US customs officials.Perceptions matter. The US has been a financial and human safe haven for many years. Now it appears that it is neither a haven, nor is it safe.The author is a Qatari banker, with many years of experience in the banking sector in senior positions.
April 27, 2025 | 10:55 PM