US ‘concern’ about being barred from GSK trial

Reuters

Shanghai

 The US is worried that its officials have been barred from attending the Aug 7 trial in China of British investigator Peter Humphrey and his American wife Yu Yingzeng after the couple were arrested last year following work they did for British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline Plc.

The concerns, voiced by the US embassy in Beijing, adds a political dimension to the trial, which could become another thorny issue between the two economic powers, already tussling over areas ranging from cyber security and human rights to Chinese policy in the South China Sea.

“We are concerned that consular officers will not be allowed to attend Ms Yu’s trial in August 2014 despite the fact that under the 1982 bilateral consular convention between our two countries consular officials are permitted to attend such trials,” US Embassy spokesman Nolan Barkhouse said yesterday.

The British embassy also said it was “engaging” the Chinese authorities about the need for a transparent and fair trial. China’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The trial of Humphrey and Yu is part of a tangled web of probes into drugmaker GSK, which Chinese police accused last year of funnelling up to 3bn yuan ($482mn) through travel agencies to bribe doctors and officials in China.

The couple are on trial for illegally buying and selling private information. The proceedings will be held behind closed doors with consular officials and the couple’s teenage son barred from attending, two family friends with knowledge of the matter told Reuters on Thursday.

ChinaWhys, the risk consultancy run by the couple, was employed by GSK in April 2013 to investigate an ex-employee suspected of sending anonymous e-mails, including the circulation of an intimate video of former GSK China head Mark Reilly with his girlfriend, as well as e-mails containing allegations of widespread bribery at the British drugmaker.

Three months later, authorities detained Humphrey and Yu. Chinese authorities have not openly made a link between GSK and the case against ChinaWhys.

Reilly has been charged along with other GSK executives of widespread bribery and corruption, and could face decades in a Chinese jail.

In a note written last year when he was already in detention, and seen by Reuters yesterday, Peter Humphrey said he felt “cheated” by GSK, adding that the drugmaker had not shared the full details of the bribery allegations against the company contained in the 23 e-mails from an anonymous whistleblower.

“GSK only asked us to do a background investigation on the suspected whistleblower. They never asked us to investigate the allegations and they did not tell us the details of the allegations,” he said in the note.

Humphrey said he had seen the detailed allegations only after the firm had completed its investigation. “I realised we had been cheated because the allegations looked real,” he added.

The head of GSK China later revealed that the suspected whistleblower — someone Humphrey described as “very influential” and who he believed to be the actual whistleblower — had obtained a copy of the ChinaWhys report.