Qatar
Qatar ‘unjustly targeted’ in Iran war, say officials
Speakers at a discussion highlight strikes on airport, energy and water facilities despite neutrality
- "Qatar rejects Iran’s claims regarding the use of its territory,” al-Ansari said, adding that such assertions were inaccurate and aimed at justifying the shelling
Qatar was "unjustly targeted” during the Iran war despite not being a party to the conflict, officials said at a panel discussion in Doha, citing missile and drone strikes that hit civilian infrastructure and injured residents.
Speakers at the event described the conflict as fundamentally between the United States and Israel on one side and Iran on the other, stressing that Gulf countries were not participants but were nonetheless exposed to repeated attacks. Qatar, they said, had rejected the war from the outset, condemned escalation, and pursued mediation efforts to prevent it.
Despite those efforts, Qatari territory came under direct attack within minutes of the American strike on February 28, according to HE Dr Majed bin Mohammed al-Ansari, adviser to the prime minister and official spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA). He said the short timeframe indicated the strikes were premeditated rather than reactive.
"Qatar rejects Iran’s claims regarding the use of its (Qatar's) territory,” al-Ansari said, adding that such assertions were inaccurate and aimed at justifying the shelling. He noted that communication channels with Iran existed at both military and political levels, and that relevant information was already publicly available, leaving little basis for misunderstanding.
Al-Ansari also stressed that Al Udeid is a sovereign Qatari base operated by the Qatari Armed Forces, despite hosting foreign forces, and said that Iranian officials were aware of this. He denied allegations that Qatari territory had been used to launch attacks against Tehran, adding that the strikes extended beyond military considerations to include civilian and strategic sites.
Major General Rakan Shayek Safar al-Hajri, Deputy Chief of Staff for Joint Operations, described the assault as the largest air attack in Qatar’s history. A total of 537 strikes were recorded, including 64 ballistic missiles launched on the first day alone.
He said Qatar faced a wide range of aerial threats, including ballistic and cruise missiles and combat aircraft, but that air defence systems intercepted more than 90% of incoming projectiles, limiting the extent of damage.
Nonetheless, several critical facilities were hit. These included Hamad International Airport, gas infrastructure in Ras Laffan, water and energy facilities in Mesaieed, and areas in Lusail City. Debris and shrapnel also fell in residential neighbourhoods, though authorities were able to contain the situation and maintain public order.
Officials said the targeting of such sites raised questions about the stated objectives of the attacks. While Iran has maintained that it was striking US-linked targets, the damage on the ground in Qatar largely affected civilian infrastructure and assets central to daily life and economic activity.
The discussion highlighted that attacks on energy facilities and desalination plants carry wider implications for the Gulf region, where water and power systems are closely linked to national security. Disruptions to these sectors can directly affect homes, hospitals and essential services, making them particularly sensitive targets.
Authorities said the response focused on protecting both citizens and residents, with the Qatar Armed Forces playing a key role in intercepting threats and the Ministry of Interior (MoI) ensuring rapid alerts, on-ground response and public safety measures.
Speakers also warned that targeting strategic infrastructure could be intended to undermine Qatar’s broader capabilities, including its role in supporting regional and global energy needs. They noted that such actions reflect a broader pattern extending beyond immediate military objectives.
The panel concluded that the attacks underscored a central contradiction in the conflict narrative. Although framed as a response to foreign military presence, the strikes, in practice, affected a country that had not taken part in the war, impacting its infrastructure, economy and population.
Officials reiterated that Qatar’s position remains focused on de-escalation and diplomacy, while maintaining readiness to protect its sovereignty and ensure stability at home.