• HOME
  • QATAR
  • REGION
  • INTERNATIONAL
  • BUSINESS
  • SPORT
  • OPINION
  • COMMUNITY
  • MEDIA
  • EPAPER
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Supplements
Saturday, November 07, 2026 Sign In
 
Subscribe

Opinion

$250bn-per-year EU spending on US energy unrealistic

Neither side has detailed what was included in the energy deal

July 31, 2025 | 11:56 PM
The European Union’s pledge to buy $250bn of US energy supplies per year is unrealistic because it would require the redirection of most US energy exports towards Europe and the EU has little control over the energy its companies import. The US and EU struck a framework trade deal on Sunday, which will impose 15% US tariffs on most EU goods. The deal included a pledge for the EU to spend $250bn annually on US energy — imports of oil, liquefied natural gas and nuclear technology — for the next three years.Total US energy exports to all buyers worldwide in 2024 amounted to $318bn, US Energy Information Administration data showed. Of that, the EU imported a combined $76bn of US petroleum, LNG and solid fuels such as coal in 2024, according to Reuters’ calculations based on Eurostat data.More than tripling those imports was unrealistic, analysts said.Arturo Regalado, senior LNG analyst at Kpler, said the scope of the energy trade envisioned in the deal "exceeds market realities.”"US oil flows would need to fully redirect towards the EU to reach the target, or the value of LNG imports from the US would need to increase sixfold,” Regalado said.There is strong competition for US energy exports as other countries need the supplies — and have themselves pledged to buy more in trade deals. Japan agreed to a "major expansion of US energy exports” in its US trade deal last week, the White House said in a statement. South Korea has also indicated interest in investing and purchasing fuel from an Alaskan LNG project as it seeks a trade deal.Competition for US energy could drive up benchmark US oil and gas prices and encourage US producers to favour exports over domestic supply. That could make fuel and power costs more expensive, which would be a political and economic headache for US and EU leaders.Neither side has detailed what was included in the energy deal — or whether it covered items such as energy services or parts for power grids and plants.The EU estimates its member countries’ plans to expand nuclear energy would require hundreds of billions of euros in investments by 2050. Its nuclear reactor-related imports, however, totalled just €53.3bn in 2024, trade data shows.The energy pledge reflected the EU’s analysis of how much US energy supply it could accommodate, a senior EU official said, but that would depend on investments in US oil and LNG infrastructure, European import infrastructure, and shipping capacity."These figures, again, are not taken out of thin air. So yes, they require investments,” said the senior official, who declined to be named. "Yes, it will vary according to the energy sources. But these are figures which are reachable.”There was no public commitment to the delivery, the official added, because the EU would not buy the energy — its companies would.Private companies import most of Europe’s oil, while a mix of private and state-run companies import gas. The European Commission can aggregate demand for LNG to negotiate better terms, but cannot force companies to buy fuel. That is a commercial decision."It’s just unrealistic,” ICIS analysts Andreas Schröder and Ajay Parmar said in written comments to Reuters. "Either Europe pays a super high non-market reflective price for US LNG or it takes way too much LNG volumes, more than it can cope with.”The United States is already the EU’s top supplier of LNG and oil, shipping 44% of EU LNG needs and 15.4% of its oil in 2024, according to EU data.Raising imports to the target would require a US LNG expansion way beyond what is planned through 2030, said Jacob Mandel, research lead at Aurora Energy Research."You can add on capacity,” Mandel said. "But if you’re talking about the scale that would be necessary to meet these targets, the $250bn, then it’s not really feasible.”Europe could buy $50bn more of US LNG annually as supply increases, he said.The EU has said it could import more US energy as its plan advances to end Russian oil and gas imports by 2028.The EU imported around 94mn barrels of Russian oil last year — 3% of the bloc’s crude purchases — and 52bcm of Russian LNG and gas, according to EU data. For comparison, the EU imported 45bcm of US LNG last year. — Reuters
Related Story
Qatar advances Global Islamic Charter for family mediation
Final day of polling in New Zealand
July 31, 2025 | 11:56 PM
RELATED ARTICLES

Cartoon Corner

Human dignity at the heart of Uzbekistan’s reform agenda

Thursday, November 05, 2026

Decoding bomb threats in Europe?

Thursday, November 05, 2026

Trump’s stark choice: deal or escalation

Thursday, November 05, 2026

How war has reshaped Gulf industrial policy

Thursday, November 05, 2026

2019: Bibi, not Tibi. 2026: Tibi, not Bibi.

Thursday, November 05, 2026

Shifting AI market narrative amid dizzying capex projections

Wednesday, November 04, 2026
All Rights Reserved © Gulf Times.