With growing fears about global warming, deadly floods linked to climate change and a new political landscape as Angela Merkel leaves the stage, it should have been the German Greens’ year.
After launching their campaign for Sunday’s general election in the spring with a youthful, energetic candidate in Annalena Baerbock, the sky seemed to be the limit — perhaps even taking the chancellery.
But although Germany has never seen an election campaign so focused on the climate crisis, the party turned in a third-place finish behind the centre-left Social Democrats (SPD), leading the race by a whisker, and the outgoing Merkel’s conservative Christian Democrats.
However Baerbock, 40, proved popular with young voters and her party with around 14% strongly improved on its 8.9% score from four years ago.
It is now widely expected to play a key kingmaker role in the coalition haggling to form a government.
“We wanted to win the chancellery, unfortunately that wasn’t possible,” Baerbock said late Sunday.
“We made mistakes but we have a clear mandate for our country and we will respect it. This country needs a government that will fight global warming — that’s the voters’ message.”
A fateful series of missteps by Baerbock as well as a perhaps more tepid appetite for change among Germans than first hoped saw the Greens’ initial lead fizzle by early summer.
It never recovered.
“It was a historic chance for the Greens,” Der Spiegel wrote in a recent cover story on Baerbock’s “catastrophic mistakes”.
“The Greens stand like no other party for the big issue of our time but that doesn’t begin to ensure that they win majorities. They need a broader base.”
Baerbock captured the imagination of Germans when she announced her candidacy in April, and her promise of a fresh start after 16 years of Merkel rocketed the party to the top of the polls.
But by this week, even her co-party leader Robert Habeck admitted that the Greens had been forced to set their sights lower.
“The distance to the chancellery has grown quite large of course,” he told the daily Die Welt.
“We saw that our political rivals didn’t have much interest in change and kept saying ‘Yes, yes, climate protection is nice but it shouldn’t be too expensive’. Without recognising that not protecting the climate is the most expensive answer.”
He said the Greens’ rivals “want to continue the Merkel era in the campaign, as shameless and complacent as possible”.
Critics sought to portray the Greens as a “prohibition party” that would lead to rises in petrol, electricity and air ticket prices.
The party has advocated stopping coal energy by 2030 instead of the current 2038, and wants production of combustion engine cars to end from the same year.
While Germans pay lip service to climate protection, a recent poll for the independent Allensbach Institute found 55% oppose paying more to ensure it.
“The Germans have decades of prosperity and growth behind them — there were hardly limits and that burned its way deep into the public consciousness,” Spiegel said.
“Doing without is linked to dark times — triggering memories among the very old of (wartime) turnip soup and alienation among the young used to having more and more to choose from.”
On the other hand climate activists, who rallied in their hundreds of thousands across Germany on Friday, said even the Greens’ ambitious programme would fall short in heading off climate-linked disasters in the coming decades.
LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*
Towards fair share: Global minimum tax targets level field
Clean energy has won the economic race
The costs to reach net zero by 2050
Russia’s Communist comeback
Geopolitical conquest of economics
Fictional drama that is too close for comfort
The inflation catch-up game
Will Federal Reserve support inclusive prosperity?