Singapore yesterday insisted it would still cane a British man convicted of drug smuggling despite a plea from London not to proceed with the punishment.
Yuen Ye Ming was sentenced by a Singapore court last year to 20 years in jail and 24 strokes of the cane after he was convicted of drug-related offences, including trafficking, consumption and possession.
Flogging with a rattan cane, a legacy of British colonial rule, is a common punishment in Singapore and the city-state rarely backs down in applying the law.
Yuen was first arrested in August 2016 for drug-related offences and was convicted last year but released on bail pending sentencing, Singapore’s interior ministry said.
While out on bail, he was arrested again for similar narcotics offences, the ministry said.
Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt had asked his Singaporean counterpart during a visit to the city-state this month that Yuen be spared caning, a spokesman for Britain’s foreign ministry said.
“We strongly oppose the use of corporal punishment, such as caning, in all cases,” the spokesman said.
“The foreign secretary personally raised this with the Singaporean minister for foreign affairs earlier this month.”
But Singapore insisted the punishment would be carried out.
“Yuen committed the crimes while he was in Singapore, and must bear the consequences of his actions in accordance with our laws,” the interior ministry said.
Singapore has in the past rejected allegations from rights groups likening caning to torture.
In 2015, two young German men were sentenced to caning and jail time for vandalising a metro train. Swiss national Oliver Fricker was also sentenced to caning and jail time in 2010 for vandalising a metro train.
Former Cabinet minister Priti Patel too condemned the punishment.
Patel, who sits on the Commons foreign affairs committee, said “the government needs to use its bilateral relations with Singapore to make clear how badly we think of this.”
Meanwhile, Yuen’s family said he could be subjected to the punishment any day at Singapore’s Changi Prison, where he is being held following his convictions.
Yuen’s businessman father has called for his son’s case to be reviewed by Singapore officials.
Alex Yuen, 70, who lives in London, said: “The fundamental principle of sentencing is that the punishment must fit the crime and the culpability of the offender, that the sentence must be fair and proportionate to the seriousness of the offence, which is measured by the degree of harm to society caused by the offender. If Ming was not genuinely remorseful and if he did not have the upmost respect for law, he would have absconded at the first opportunity instead of remaining in Singapore to attend court again and again, waiting to exchange his freedom for many years of incarceration and caning.”
Related Story