Trump would accept the poll result if it’s fair, says son
October 23 2016 11:50 PM
Supporters of Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump protest outside the CNN offices in Hollywood, California.


Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump will “100%” accept the results of the US election if it is fair, his son Eric Trump said yesterday.
“I think what my father is saying is, ‘I want a fair election,’” Eric Trump said on ABC’s This Week.
“If it’s a fair outcome, he will absolutely accept it. There’s no question about that.”
With national opinion polls showing Clinton with an increasing lead over Trump ahead of the November 8 election, Donald Trump has repeatedly said the election is being “rigged” against him.
He has not offered evidence and numerous studies have shown that the US election system, which is decentralised and run by the states, is sound.
At last week’s debate with Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, Trump challenged a cornerstone of American democracy by refusing to commit to honouring the result of the US election.
“What I’m saying is that I will tell you at the time.I’ll keep you in suspense. OK?” Trump said.
In the aftermath of the debate, Trump said he would accept the election outcome “if I win.”
Trump’s campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, also was pressed yesterday on CNN’s State of the Union on whether Trump would accept the election results.
“The system is rigged, especially against the little guy,” said Conway without directly responding to the question.
She spoke of any challenges to the election results as “hypothetical”.
The efforts by members of Trump’s inner circle to downplay his remarks about the integrity of the election indicate he would come under significant pressure to accept the result if he were to lose.
Republican Party chairman Reince Priebus said that by asking Trump to agree to concede, the media was making an extraordinary request.
He said Trump would only fight if the election were close and is not trying to dispute a fair election.
“That’s not quite what he’s saying.
What he’s saying is he wants to reserve all options and if there is ground for a recount I’ll reserve all options,” Priebus said on CBS’s Face The Nation.
Clinton and Trump are campaigning in the key swing states of Florida and North Carolina, where the latest polls show they are within only a few points of each other.
The telecom-media giant that would be formed if federal regulators approve AT&T Inc’s $85.4bn purchase of Time Warner Inc raises antitrust issues, Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine and several 
US lawmakers said yesterday.
Kaine said lawmakers and regulators would have to review the deal and “get to the bottom” of questions over whether the merger would decrease competition.
“I’m pro-competition,” Kaine said on NBC’s Meet the Press. “Less concentration, I think, is generally helpful especially in the media.”
Kaine, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s running mate, said he had not had a chance to review the details of the deal.
The Clinton campaign did not respond to a request for comment.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said at a rally on Saturday after the deal was announced that he would block it if he wins the November 8 election against Democrat Hillary Clinton.
“It’s too much concentration of power in the hands of too few,” said Trump, who has accused the media of being biased against him and his campaign.
The US justice department, not the president, has the power to reject such a deal if it violates antitrust laws.
AT&T said it is unclear if the Federal Communications Commission will have jurisdiction to review the deal.
A spokesman for the justice department declined to comment on the deal yesterday and an AT&T spokesman also declined to comment on lawmaker criticism.
The biggest deal in the world this year will, if approved by regulators, give AT&T control of cable TV channels HBO and CNN, film studio Warner Bros and other coveted media assets.
It raises concerns that AT&T might try to limit distribution of Time Warner material.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson told reporters on Saturday night he believes regulators will approve the deal.
The government typically in a vertical merger deals with concerns “by remedies, concessions if you will, and conditions imposed on a combination”.
Stephenson said there is “no competitive harm that is being rendered by putting these two companies together, so any concerns by the regulators, we believe, will be adequately addressed by conditions.”
Senators Mike Lee, the Republican chair of the senate subcommittee on antitrust, and Amy Klobuchar, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said yesterday the committee would carefully scrutinise the merger.
“We have carefully examined consolidation in the cable and video content industries to ensure that it does not harm consumers,” they said in a joint statement.”An acquisition of Time Warner by AT&T would potentially raise significant antitrust issues, which the subcommittee would carefully examine.”
Lawmakers may pursue inquiries into the merger and build support for or against it, but it is ultimately up to the justice department to approve, block or place conditions on the deal.
AT&T will pay $107.50 per Time Warner share — half in cash and half in stock — worth $85.4bn overall, according to a company statement.
AT&T said it expected to close the deal by the end of 2017.
Dallas-based AT&T said the Justice Department would review the deal and said the Federal Communications Commission may also have to approve the deal.
Two of the biggest congressional critics of the mega-mergers among media companies and elsewhere in the US economy said late on Saturday that they would take a hard look at this deal.
Senator Richard Blumenthal, who is on the senate judiciary committee, noted the proposed acquisition would combine a wireless company, a pay-TV provider and a studio.
“I will be looking closely at what this merger means for consumers and their pocketbooks and whether it stands up to the rigorous review standards set by the Department of Justice’s antitrust division in the last few years,” he said.
Senator Al Franken, who is also on the Judiciary Committee, said that the deal raised “immediate flags”.
“I’m skeptical of huge media mergers because they can lead to higher costs, fewer choices, and even worse service for consumers,” he said. “And regulators often agree, like when Comcast unsuccessfully tried to buy Time Warner Cable, a deal that I fiercely opposed.”
Despite their concern, a handful of antitrust experts said AT&T’s bid for Time Warner would likely win US
antitrust approval and two thought there may not even be conditions put on it.
“(The Justice Department) will look at it but they won’t stop it,” said Darren Bush, who teaches antitrust at the University of Houston’s law school.
Andre Barlow, an antitrust expert with the law firm Doyle, Barlow and Mazard PLLC, who noted that the government may worry about whether other cable and Internet companies would continue to have access to Time Warner content like HBO and CNN.
“It’s a smaller version of the Comcast/NBCU deal but it raises the same types of concerns,” he said.

There are no comments.

LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*