International
Court rejects appeal for CBI probe
Court rejects appeal for CBI probe
IANS/Kolkata
The Calcutta High Court yesterday rejected an appeal for a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the Saradha chit fund scam. |
A bench of Justices A K Banerjee and M K Chowdhury said it will hear the matter on June 5, when the court reopens after the summer vacations beginning today.
“As regards the question of a CBI probe into the scam, we feel the time has not come. We will have to consider the plea only after perusal of the pleadings by the respective parties,” the bench said.
“We have not rejected the petitioner’s plea and may accept it at a later stage after hearing all the parties,” the court said, adding: “We would subserve justice if we dispose off the matter without fully hearing the parties.”
Citing unavailability, the division bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Joymalyo Bagchi, which was hearing the matter earlier, on Wednesday assigned this bench to hear the issue.
Pressing for a CBI probe, the petitioners said the Saradha Group chit fund scam was a financial offence of a grave nature which was not confined to West Bengal, but has affected many across the country.
“The state government is not capable of probing this matter. When the offence has affected almost the entire country, only a central agency like the CBI can investigate the matter,” argued Subrata Mukherjee, one of the petitioners.
The government pleader opposed the petitioner’s plea saying the government is diligently progressing with the probe and does not need the CBI’s support.
Hearing the respective parties, the court fixed June 5 for the next hearing.
With as many as three public interest litigations (PILs) and a host of parties including the Reserve Bank of India, SEBI, Enforcement Directorate, CBI and the West Bengal government, the court ordered all the parties to complete all legal formalities including documentation and serving copies of the documents to the other stakeholders by May 23.
The court appointed an advocate who has been assigned to complete the paperwork for the court in respect of the pleadings and documentation of all the litigants.
The court during the day also directed the state government to provide all documents pertaining to the investigation to the ED.