Guardian News and Media London
The true cost to the public of building a third runway at Heathrow has not been spelled out to taxpayers, according to a cross-party group of MPs, who warn that domestic flight connections and other transport spending will be jeopardised.
Justine Greening, who quit Theresa May’s Cabinet in January, is among the MPs calling on the government to clarify what backing expansion at the London hub airport would mean, saying: “The transport secretary has a duty to spell out the true costs for taxpayers – and to be realistic about the benefits.”
In a letter to the Guardian, MPs and councils around Heathrow warn that promised domestic flight connections would only work with state subsidies that could not be guaranteed in perpetuity.
Additionally, more than £10bn in additional rail and road spending to support a bigger airport would be laid on the public purse, they say: “What is certain is that taxpayers everywhere – including those living hundreds of miles away from the south-east – will all be paying for the expansion.”
Having muted her opposition to Heathrow while in the Cabinet, Greening’s intervention comes alongside signatories including Conservative and Labour MPs in west London constituencies, Liberal Democrats leader Vince Cable, and councils led by Richmond.
Greening, MP for Putney and a former transport secretary, told the Guardian that Scottish support for the third runway was misplaced. “The SNP need to wake up to the threat that an expanded Heathrow poses to Scotland,” she said.
“A more expensive Heathrow means fewer connections. People in Scotland won’t understand why the Scottish government thinks that’s a good idea to support.”
Although Heathrow has pledged to keep charges “close to current levels”, and proposed a new scheme that reduces its own the runway and infrastructure costs to £14.3bn, the government’s Airports Commission forecast – and airlines fear -– significant price rises to pay for it.
Greening added: “That’s what the modelling shows – and worse than that, the transport infrastructure to support expansion will be paid for by the taxpayer. That will mean that other investment projects that should have happened for the rest of the country will not get funding. The funding will be sucked in to another southern transport infrastructure project.”
Transport for London has estimated that the bill for additional rail and road infrastructure around an expanded Heathrow could be as much as £15bn.
Heathrow said that the points raised by the MPs had repeatedly been shown to be unfounded. A spokesperson said: “Heathrow has already halved airport charges for domestic passengers and will set aside £10mn in start-up capital to fund new domestic routes. With expansion, we will create the capacity to connect all of Britain to global markets and it will be entirely privately funded at no cost to the taxpayer.”
LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*
Nicaraguan town defies govt siege to bury dead
Canada remains defiant of Trump
Congress to legislate to end family separations
Trump to sign order on family separations at US border
New York receives separated children, prepares to sue government
UK PM calls US images of migrant children 'deeply disturbing'
US crackdown on migrants criticised
Morales in Beijing
Trump orders the creation of a space-focused military branch